To: Accygirl
I consider the pot roast to be the metaphor for the ideal 1950s housewife... No modern woman has enough time to cook a pot roast for a weekday meal in today's world, whether or not they stay at home. That ideal is something that I do despise as it significantly limits women's intellectual self-worth. The idea that men would demand that women actually stay in the kitchen and that this idea was accepted by society as okay is abhorrent to me.Wow. That really reveals a lot about you.
Cooking a pot roast for your husband, does not make you repressed or limit your intellectual self-worth.
If you really believe that, you have no intellect to feel any self worth about, so I guess it would be understandable that you feel that way.
Sheesh. It's just a pot roast. Get over it.
340 posted on
11/27/2006 2:17:13 PM PST by
Jotmo
(I Had a Bad Experience With the CIA and Now I'm Gonna Show You My Feminine Side - Swirling Eddies)
To: Jotmo
I cooked pot roast last week. It's really easy, and you can do most of the work beforehand. I also cooked pot roasts when I was a single working woman. I actually cooked more when I was a single working woman. I don't have as much time now that I have 3 kids.
To: Accygirl
That ideal is something that I do despise as it significantly limits women's intellectual self-worth. The idea that men would demand that women actually stay in the kitchen and that this idea was accepted by society as okay is abhorrent to me. Did I forget to mention your obvious, in-your-face anger?
344 posted on
11/27/2006 2:27:02 PM PST by
Campion
("I am so tired of you, liberal church in America" -- Mother Angelica, 1993)
To: Jotmo
It's a metaphor for a society as a whole that was very repressive toward women (i.e. the steretypical T.V. housewife in heels cooking her husband dinner). The only thing that a middle-class women during the 1950s could do was cook and clean for her husband and children. If she even received a college degree (very unlikely as the percentage of women who went to college remained flat while the percentage of men attending it spiked during the 50s), she couldn't get a job outside the house. There were also no laws protecting women from workplace harassment and employment discrimination, so it was legal to hire a man over an equally qualified woman just because he was a man.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson