In years to come, the strategic balance of international power structures will be influenced by control of the SW Asian theater in the foreseeable future.
One method of control is by all nations abiding by international respect for the legitimate governance of their respective nations. When a foreign leader rebels from that most basic of international foreign policy, he threatens the entire international community with criminal behavior of international proportion.
Saddam Hussein lost. Pure and simple. He exhibited criminal and tyrannical behavior throughout his years of control in Iraq. He overstepped his bounds and over the course of time was removed from authority.
BTW, there have been far too many unpublicised terrorist acts pre-empted to pretend AQ and other Islamic extremeist operatives haven't nor are very busy in efforts to deploy unconventional weaponry to ignore the intelligence indicators.
If you choose to play along the rather inept socialist media campaign to discredit anything supporting the GWOT, then remain myopically absorbed on GW Bush and the Iraq Campaign. The situation is dynamic and that basically is old business.
There are dictators all over the world who were/are worse than Saddam. Do you support invading those countries too?
BTW, there have been far too many unpublicised terrorist acts pre-empted to pretend AQ and other Islamic extremeist operatives haven't nor are very busy in efforts to deploy unconventional weaponry to ignore the intelligence indicators.
Do you have documentation of any AQ attack using Iraqi WMDs, either before or after the war?
If you choose to play along the rather inept socialist media campaign to discredit anything supporting the GWOT, then remain myopically absorbed on GW Bush and the Iraq Campaign. The situation is dynamic and that basically is old business.
Huh??? I consider the daily killing and maiming of our boys in Iraq to be of prime concern to everyone, not just "old business".