[mikegi]

Perhaps you should have listened to the explanations given of the rationale before and during the war, only one portion of which was the WMD. It amazes me to see how many freepers have fallen for the MSM line and are completely ignorant of what the mission really was.

Ok, remind me again why Iraq was such a threat to America that we needed to suffer 3000 KIAs, 20,000 WIAs, and an eventual withdrawal under fire? I want to compare them to your posts *before* the war to make sure that your rationale hasn't changed over time...

[ohioWfan]

I'm not talking about my 'rationale.' I'm talking about the position of the administration, and the reasons clearly given for going into Iraq.

They haven't changed.

Saddam violated more than a dozen UN resolutions. They fired at our planes. They were building nuclear weapons. They had used WMD. They were a threat to American security.

There has been ample proof of that in the Saddam documents.

The fact that you clearly know nothing about what was going on before, or what has gone on since we invaded and successfully deposed Saddam is something I wouldn't advertise if I were you.

Maybe you should stop posting before you look any more MSM brainwashed than you already do.

[gusopol3]

I want to compare them to your posts *before* the war to make sure that your rationale hasn't changed over time...

sorry the link didn't work; it still works from Google with keywords: "Bush, Iraq, 2002." Bush said it was part of the war on terror which had brought as many deaths here in one morning as (I join you in mourning) have occured in 3 1/2 years of fighting.