Actually, that's the main problem: why in the hell did we invade Iraq without knowing that there were WMDs??? What a colossal blunder. We'll be paying for this error for years to come (both Republicans and America).
because we didn't invade based on whether or not he had WMD's. As many leftists have been saying for years, the best way to avoid being invaded, like NK, is to have WMDs.
Perhaps you should have listened to the explanations given of the rationale before and during the war, only one portion of which was the WMD.
It amazes me to see how many freepers have fallen for the MSM line and are completely ignorant of what the mission really was.
Saddam had chemical and biological WMD. The pre-war inspections found them. That is not even debatable.
Saddam was supposed to get rid of these weapons and Saddam was supposed to prove that he did.
Saddam didn't do that.
The error was Saddam's.
You, sir, are amazing!!
Do you know that every intelligence service and government in Europe, the Middle East, and our own "knew" that Saddam had WMDs?
Even captured Iraqi Generals said that they always thought that they had it and that Saddam deceived them to prop them up against a US invasion.
Why didn't you say something when RATS like JFnK, Hitlery and others declared that Saddam had to be dealt with because of "his" WMDs? What about the Klintoon administration and the Senate vote on "changing the Iraqi Regime"?
Wise up, sir, and try to be better informed of the last few years of history.
You are kidding, right?