1- Leaving Iraq without an army? Your wording of "democracy" = redeploy = leave = cut and run. After spending our blood and treasure, you want to give Iraq to Iran with "ayatollah" Sadr at the helm?
2- Wrong target, Commander Bond, you should think of bombing Iran to get rid of their nuclear industry, Syria will fold thus preventing a Lebanese civil war and ending support to Hizballah, and definitely stop Iran from fooling around in Iraq.
The question is what would that do to your pro-life Senators?
What choice do we have? We can not continue a war that without the support of the people.
Thank you, that is the first reasonable argument I've seen from the non-cowardly and non-liberal crowd ;) Iraq was going to end out a satellite of Iran as soon as we took out Saddam. It is shiite majority, and post-invasion it will be weaker. Unless we actualy take out Iran while we are at. Ironically, that might work better for nation building, because the Iranian youth are secularized.
2- Wrong target, Commander Bond, you should think of bombing Iran to get rid of their nuclear industry, Syria will fold thus preventing a Lebanese civil war and ending support to Hizballah, and definitely stop Iran from fooling around in Iraq.
I do support a Bush-I type job on Iran - don't overthrow the regime, but destroy much of the military and set their nuclear program back to square one. One of the downsides of Iraq is that this makes it much tougher to do this politically. The question is what would that do to your pro-life Senators?