Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thebaddog
It's not surprising that her concern has nothing to do with whether her decision was right under the law or the constitution. She was always about policymaking, not judging.

I'm so pleased she retired. Even when she accidentally got the Constitutional issues right, her decisions always turned on splitting a hair noone else could even see and left the law murkier than it was before she lifted her pen. One of the worst judges ever to sit on the Supreme Court.

10 posted on 11/24/2006 8:11:44 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ModelBreaker

That is big charge. Kennedy and Souter and Breyer and Ginsberg are still there making mischief. I guess that at least they are predictable and O'Conner wasn't.


13 posted on 11/25/2006 4:26:48 AM PST by Thebaddog (Labrador Retrievers are the dog's dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson