Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: protest1
I simply don't see this as a religious issue. Folks are trying to make it sure but that doesn't make it so. Employers should and do have the right to dictate uniform standards and no jewelry outside the uniform seems perfectly reasonable and commonplace. Lastly my fear is we allow this and we'll have no argument against followers of other more dangerous faiths from using the same argument. What's going to be the new corporate policy...'We can dictate our uniform standards unless your need for religious expression is too important.'
5 posted on 11/24/2006 2:55:28 PM PST by Bogeygolfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Bogeygolfer

"Lastly my fear is we allow this and we'll have no argument against followers of other more dangerous faiths from using the same argument."

This is a religious issue, as it is ONLY Christians who are falling under the "no jewellery" rule. It will not leave us unable to object to displays of religious apparel by muslims or others as they are already exempt! BA allows head scarf by muslims, and various jewellery by Hindus as well as turbans by Sikhs.


6 posted on 11/24/2006 3:09:41 PM PST by protest1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson