Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onedoug
I liked Cap too, and maybe I'm missing something there, but damned if I can see what it was.

Did you read the entire interview? Doesn't sound like it!

There was an-in-depth explanation of what the posture was...and the internal fractures in the policy. There was no mission. There was no political possibility of having a real mission. We were in the middle of a genocidal civil war...where one of the sides clearly didn't want us there at all.

There were much bigger fish to fry...the Soviets who were angling in the region to smear us. And there was no initial understanding of Iran's complicity in hitting us. Not for YEARS. Cap was all for hitting who ever did it. But it wasn't a straightforward "we did it" situation.

It was a one-man suicide run. The "finger-prints" of Iran took a lot longer to piece together.

229 posted on 11/24/2006 3:20:31 PM PST by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: Paul Ross

Pan-Islamism existed long before that. Tell it to the Marines, one guesses.


236 posted on 11/24/2006 3:58:01 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson