[zbigreddogz]

The RINOs said the same thing about Reagan.

Ah! The reverse name-calling defence. My guy is just like Reagan, therefore, since Reagan was good/electable/in favor of X policy, you are either for me, or against Reagan.

Problem is, the guy is never really like Reagan, the policy is usually not like Reagan, and the arguement is therefore meaningless. It's a tactic for the intellectually bankrupt who have run out of arguments.

[Paul Ross]

Ah! The reverse name-calling defence. My guy is just like Reagan, therefore, since Reagan was good/electable/in favor of X policy, you are either for me, or against Reagan. Problem is, the guy is never really like Reagan,

Except Duncan Hunter IS, ideologically, like Reagan. Peace through strength is his byward.

the policy is usually not like Reagan

Your argument doesn't fly against Hunter, RINO.

and the arguement is therefore meaningless.

Your argument is, you mean. Note, you never did refute the facts of that analogy.

It's a tactic for the intellectually bankrupt ...

Again your argument is bankrupt. And your spelling is atrocious! LOL! RINO!