Replies

The study of variation is really where Darwin made a contribution. Ditto, Mendel. So why not focus on the correlations we can look at now rather that worry about remote ancestery? If we try hard enough we will gain knowledge far more valuable than our relationship to Chimps.

Its all a part of the same study. Why should scientists censor one part of a new and exciting field of investigation?

It is a matter of focus and energy , is it not? There are a relative handful of scholars who study the history of economics, more working on the present application of new data. Yes, one must look backwards, but only to make sure that it is oK to pass the car in front.

The possible DNA combinations are, 4 x

4,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
It is said that any number larger than 2 x 10 to the 30^th power cannot occur in nature. Yet you will believe with the faith of a religion.
Dixon and Webb calculation, on page 667 of their standard reference work.
“In order to get the needed amino acids in close enough proximity to form a single protein molecule, a total volume of amino-acid solution equal to 10 to the 50^th power times the volume of our earth would be needed!. That would be a bowl of solution bigger than our earth, the earth would fit in it. Yet you will believe with the faith of a religion.
The possible arrangements of 20 different amino acids are, 2,500,000,000,000,000,000 possible arrangements. That in itself is a large number, not as large as above.
If evolution is true than every protein arrangement in a life form had to be worked out by chaotic random chance until it worked right. First one combination then another, until one was found that worked, but the organism would have been long dead, if ever alive.
The probability of forming 124 specifically sequenced proteins of 400 amino acids each by chance is 1 x 10 to the 64489 power. Yet chaotic random chance can do it.

The odds are so impossible that even the simple beginnings could not have happened by chance. Yet evolutionist will hold to their religion {nothing created everything} with dogmatic fervor as strongly as anyone who believes in God as their creator.