Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JustaDumbBlonde
The stewardess from the flight said the men requesting the extensions were not large enough to need them. Consequently, I think the question should be, why did they ask for them?

If they wanted to commit a terrorist act they could use them to restrain someone else or to strangle someone. Or, as someone on another thread posted (the poster said she is a stewardess), the metal parts of the seat belt extensions could really do some damage if you hit someone with them.

19 posted on 11/23/2006 6:28:24 PM PST by Oorang (Tyranny thrives best where government need not fear the wrath of an armed people - Alex Kozinski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Oorang; mvpel

Thanks for your responses. I didn't realize that the extensions were useful as a weapon. Seemed to me that a belt with a large buckle would accomplish the same thing, yet those are not banned. Oh, well.


23 posted on 11/23/2006 6:37:06 PM PST by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson