Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: babygene
I've always thought that races of man were the equivalent to "breeds" in other animals such as dogs and cats.

Anyone have any thoughts about this?

Its a bit more complex than that.

There are genetic races (based on descent), and there are geographic races (based on living conditions). There is no necessary connection between the two.

Extremely small, dark skinned individuals are found in several areas (Pygmies, Negritoes, etc.). Some of the tribes in the Amazonian rain forests are tending in this direction as well, but have not quite had time to pick up all of the adaptations of the other groups. These specialized traits are geographic in origin, and there is no close genetic relationship among these groups.

In the opposite direction, groups which are relatively closely related genetically can look quite different. An example would be the Pygmies and Watusi of Africa.

11 posted on 11/23/2006 2:20:52 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

Are coyotes and domestic dogs two different races of canines?

Or are domestic dogs several hundred different "races" -- mostly the AKC breeds -- with coyotes being just another breed?


12 posted on 11/23/2006 2:42:05 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson