Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant
Brilliant said: "There is no need for a law abiding citizen to have a gun in a police station. "

Do you have a very long list of places where the law-abiding should be at the mercy of armed criminals? I just pointed out that I would have been the only target available to a bad guy in the waiting area of a police station. Why should I be denied the right to defend myself from such a criminal? Why do you presume that disarming me, given that I will not wilfully disobey the law, will have any effect whatever on criminal behavior?

What PR value would there be in having me defenseless and gunned down in the waiting area of a police station? You might look on it as a PR victory that a police officer was not killed, but my family would view it as a tragedy enabled by feel-good laws.

34 posted on 11/22/2006 3:08:16 PM PST by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell

You're not at the mercy of armed criminals. You're surrounded by cops who have guns.


35 posted on 11/22/2006 3:59:29 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson