To: highimpact
Should future raids be conducted with more force to prevent dangerous 92 year old women from wounding officers with a rusty pistol?No. Future "raids" should be conducted after performing surveillance on the house, and if it's discovered the sole occupant is a 92-year old woman, they should be conducted by uniformed officers who knock on the door, smile, and say "Good afternoon, Ma'm! Mind if we take a look around?", instead of going in like f$%king SEAL Team Six.
I'd also like to know what kind of "narcotics" they thought were in there. This kind of sh!t isn't justified for a couple bags of pot.
24 posted on
11/21/2006 9:29:28 PM PST by
lesser_satan
(EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
To: lesser_satan
I don't think it is justified at all.
27 posted on
11/21/2006 9:31:18 PM PST by
DB
To: lesser_satan
Very true. No doubt a huge wrongful-death lawsuit is already in the works. It would seem that the police involved have an impossibly deep hole to climb out of.
To: lesser_satan
lol@"going in like f$%king SEAL Team Six"
lmao
30 posted on
11/21/2006 9:34:24 PM PST by
miliantnutcase
("If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it." -ichabod1)
To: lesser_satan
No. Future "raids" should be conducted after performing surveillance on the house, and if it's discovered the sole occupant is a 92-year old woman, they should be conducted by uniformed officers who knock on the door, smile, and say "Good afternoon, Ma'm! Mind if we take a look around?", instead of going in like f$%king SEAL Team Six. I'm on your side, FRiend. My last question was sarcastic. If there was ever a war that could be described as a "quagmire," the war on drugs is it.
To: lesser_satan
Flowers will get you in any door with a smile.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson