Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant; presidio9; AnotherUnixGeek; The Ghost of FReepers Past; marsh_of_mists; ...
The Supreme Beings should weigh in on this.

It was landmark U.S. Supreme Court precedent Reynolds v. United States in 1878 that made “separation of church and state” a dubiously legitimate point of case law, but more importantly; it confirmed the Constitutionality in statutory regulation of marriage practices.

(See also: Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States, 1890.)

No man can become a law unto himself under the guise of freedom of religion... Marriage is a religious rite, not a civil right...

"We have the right to regulate practice, not belief." (Reynolds)

118 posted on 11/21/2006 6:38:19 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Yeah, but they said that criminalizing sodomy was Constitutional too, and then overruled it just 17 years later.


123 posted on 11/21/2006 7:08:13 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson