Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9

There should be no reason why a male goat, horse, or other barnyard friend cannot marry a woman. If the barnyard friend makes the first move on the woman and she consents, you have the consent that is necessary. Once the rules have changed from one man and one woman, anything should go.

It is problematical with a female barnyard friend. How can a male human prove that the animal gave consent?

I don't know how to evaluate a homesexual male human getting together with a homosexual barnyard friend. And transgendered barnyard friends really loses me.


109 posted on 11/21/2006 5:08:43 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: doug from upland
I may be naive but I don't see how any judge could expand deviant human intercourse to include human/animal intercourse. It simply doesn't follow. Different flesh. If a judge tried, he would be overturned.

111 posted on 11/21/2006 5:31:35 PM PST by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson