Skip to comments.
Polygamists fight to decriminalize bigamy
The Washington Post ^
| Nov 21, 2006
| John Pomfret
Posted on 11/21/2006 1:36:33 PM PST by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-199 next last
To: Red Badger
Most of these guys are losers anyway. Doubt they paid a dime in taxes since they were born.
To: presidio9
![](http://www.schockwellenreiter.de/images2/poly.gif)
Legalize It, Mon!!!
22
posted on
11/21/2006 1:50:44 PM PST
by
AdamSelene235
(Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
To: JennysCool
And could couples opt out their marriage licenses that they would NOT be open to polygamy, or could any husband just spring a new wife on you one day? Do both partners have to consent? Oh, gee, what a mess.
Let's face it. My husband could come home and tell me he wants a divorce. Or he might even come home and tell me he has a mistress. Or that he has a mistress and wants a divorce.
BUT - at least - I can go to bed at night knowing that he won't come home with a second wife! (Not that I'm anticipating any of the above to happen...)
To: A. Pole
"Why would you deny right of another woman to marry a man, just because one already did it?"
If it were my husband, you're darn right I would deny her "that right!"
To: AdamSelene235
To: kjo
Of course we knew this was coming; the liberals did this with their adoption of moral relativism. I blame the Old Testament, myself.
26
posted on
11/21/2006 1:53:32 PM PST
by
AdamSelene235
(Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
To: presidio9
What about women? Can they have more than one husband? Seems fair, no?
To: 2banana
Muslims can take up to 4 wives. This will help with Sharia Law where applicable.This is very important, who wants these haters breeding with 4 women and counting on welfare from us infidels to support a growing population that hates us? France anyone?
Regards.
28
posted on
11/21/2006 1:55:58 PM PST
by
ARE SOLE
To: presidio9
Let's hear it for the bestialitists!
29
posted on
11/21/2006 1:58:35 PM PST
by
Savage Beast
("Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly.")
To: presidio9
In all of this, all I ever see is multiple wives mentioned.
I have seen one (1) plural "marriage" of a woman with three "husbands", but that was 1960s Berzerkely.
It is almost always seems to be about having a steady supply of younger, warmer pockets to keep "junior" warm in, on an otherwise cold, headachy night.
30
posted on
11/21/2006 2:01:42 PM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
(Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
To: presidio9
One woman complicates your life so much, why would anyone want more then one?
31
posted on
11/21/2006 2:04:16 PM PST
by
outofsalt
("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
To: outofsalt
Well, I was going to try polygamy but so far I've only found one woman who would marry me.
To: Red Badger
33
posted on
11/21/2006 2:09:44 PM PST
by
Fido969
("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
To: Texas_shutterbug
What do you think those first wives feel like when they see their husband taking his next wife. Do you feel it materially different from this when a divorce happens in between?
Face it, America. We already have legal polygamy. The only catch is it has to occur serially and not concurrently.
34
posted on
11/21/2006 2:10:22 PM PST
by
LexBaird
(98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
To: presidio9
In her battle to legalize polygamy, the only thing Valerie hasn't revealed is her last name I bet she hasn't revealed her affiliation with the Dimm party, either.
Guess TWP is picking up signs that Romney could be a formidable candidate.
To: JennysCool
Surely you can come up with a better argument against polygamy than that. The current legal structure can be easily modified to handle polygamy.
To: AnotherUnixGeek
The problem with poligamy is that after 3 generations, you have a 50% chance of marrying a cousin. Poligamy shuts some many men out of the gene pool: they are driven out of the community, and can lead to severe genetic problems in a population. (Hence, the Mormons) This is called "Founder's Syndrome", where a recessive genenetic problem gets spread throughout a community.
37
posted on
11/21/2006 2:10:57 PM PST
by
bukkdems
(If this global warming gets out of hand, we can use some of that nuclear winter.)
To: Texas_shutterbug
You have not been exposed to very many polygamists have you. Most wives would not trade their life for anything in the world.
To: presidio9
Hmmm...this would be newsworthy if they wanted to criminalize bigamy rather than decriminalize it.
39
posted on
11/21/2006 2:12:40 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(Tagline on vacation)
To: LexBaird
Face it, America. We already have legal polygamy. The only catch is it has to occur serially and not concurrently.
________________________________________________________
and that's a good thing
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Taylor
40
posted on
11/21/2006 2:12:44 PM PST
by
sodpoodle
(I have no idea how I got here - but I like it and I plan to stay.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-199 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson