Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Activists Up In Arms Over New Citizenship Test
The Stiletto ^ | November 20, 2006 | The Stiletto

Posted on 11/21/2006 8:51:18 AM PST by theothercheek

Typical questions on the US citizenship test include: “How many states are there in the United States?”; “Where is the White House located?”; and “What are the 49th and 50th states of the Union?”

The US government is scrapping this test, which requires nothing more than rote memorization of facts, in favor of a new 10-question oral exam conducted in English that tests an immigrant’s grasp of the principles of American democracy, including the freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. The change is meant to counteract a 20-30 year retreat from emphasizing Americanization in favor of multiculturalism – a reaction, in part, to the worsening cultural and societal problems caused by large populations of unassimilated immigrants in Europe.

Chris Bentley, spokesman for the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) agency tells The Washington Times that the proposed test for naturalized citizenship has its roots in a report by a Clinton administration commission headed by former Rep. Barbara Jordan that emphasized "effective Americanization of new immigrants, that is the cultivation of a shared commitment to the American values of liberty, democracy and equal opportunity," including policies to "help newcomers learn to speak, read and write English effectively."

Some immigrants "come from a culture, a government, a society that is completely removed from our concept of government," Shawn Saucier, another USCIS spokesman tells The Christian Science Monitor.

The new test makes sense to The Stiletto, but more than 220 immigrant organizations signed a letter to USCIS Director Emilio Gonzalez that charges the new test is an insurmountable barrier for "poorer legal immigrants with less English and less education" to getting US citizenship, The Washington Times reports.

The new test will be administered on a trial basis in 10 cities beginning this winter, and will be phased in nationwide by January 2008. Immigrants who fail – that is, answer fewer than six questions correctly - can take the standard test, which almost no one fails.

NOTE: This is the second article in a feature called "The Daily Blade," and follows an article titled "Dems Beset By Indecision, Infighting And Intrigue." The original source includes links to relevant articles and Web sites.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: assimilation; citizenship; immigration; meltingpot; thestiletto; thestilettoblog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: TChris

Just making sure they know the mission of the U.N. is to establish a One-World Order and neutralize the United States.


41 posted on 11/21/2006 9:41:37 AM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

They are testing the test.


42 posted on 11/21/2006 9:48:40 AM PST by 3niner (War is one game where the home team always loses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

Uh, I studied history in college and a) someone above is correct in postulating as to whether a college grad could past this test and b)real testing is social sciences at a college level is always an essay option if the instructor is sincere. Multiple choice in history is a joke and if someone wants to become a citizen they should have a concept of the functionality of both American government and society. Simply asking where the capital is or similar trivia is pretty much begging the uninterested to forget their lessons, but a more difficult exam will help to better instill a sense of what it is to be an American.


43 posted on 11/21/2006 9:51:11 AM PST by Historix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek

"But understand that my client must become a citizen before she qualifies for the panoply of welfare benefits available to United States citizens. It is grossly unfair to ask her to spell: `US'."
Stan the immigration lawyer/Best Buy salesman


44 posted on 11/21/2006 10:04:34 AM PST by tumblindice (Enquiring minds want to know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Not true. If she has an "anchor baby" the baby qualifies for ALL benefits. Therefore the illegal alien benefits too.


45 posted on 11/21/2006 10:22:34 AM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
including the freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.

2/3 of Congress couldn't pass those questions. Nearly 3/4 of the judiciary as well...

46 posted on 11/21/2006 10:28:25 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theothercheek
The US government is scrapping this test, which requires nothing more than rote memorization of facts, in favor of a new 10-question oral exam conducted in English that tests an immigrant’s grasp of the principles of American democracy, including the freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. The change is meant to counteract a 20-30 year retreat from emphasizing Americanization in favor of multiculturalism – a reaction, in part, to the worsening cultural and societal problems caused by large populations of unassimilated immigrants in Europe.

These people lie, lie, and continue to lie. My wife took the naturalization exam last year and passed with flying colors. The test emphasized Americanization, NOT MULTICULTRALISM. My Russian wife was so impressed with American history she went around for two or three months saying, "Just give me liberty or give me death."
47 posted on 11/21/2006 12:10:10 PM PST by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave

Further it was written by Lincoln and issued under the concept (conceit?) of wartime powers as an Executive Order. The Cabinet never voted until after its issuance and it never to the best of my knowledge received any legislative blessing.


48 posted on 11/21/2006 12:19:34 PM PST by masadaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: masadaman

Interesting... thanks for the info. I was interested in examining how Executive Orders began and how they got to the point they are today (substitutes for the amendment ratification process). If the justification is "emergency powers" then they should be of defined duration (two years, for example) and then expire.


49 posted on 11/21/2006 12:28:12 PM PST by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave
The left criticizes Bush for using emergency powers all the while lauding Lincoln for the same. Additionally Lincoln had certain legislators detained and others were sent on unfortunate missions, all without any judicial oversight or review.

By the way, the Cabinet never "voted." My mistake. Lincoln asked for comments and it (the Proclamation) went out the door before they again met.

50 posted on 11/21/2006 12:41:17 PM PST by masadaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

Makes you really trust all those claims of "strict requirements" when those illegals get on that path to citizenship huh?


51 posted on 11/21/2006 3:21:55 PM PST by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson