I agree that it's horrible, and I have been face-to-face with the results of it as well. I was a police officer for a time, and I saw plenty.
Sex offenders frequently are put in the general population, and they get just the kind of brutal treatment you call for. I don't know if that causes lower repeat offenses or not.
What I do know is that many sex offenders were childhood victims of sexual abuse themselves. It's so common as to be nearly assumed. That history of sexual abuse does not excuse the crime, but it helps explain it. And it leads me to believe that further sexual abuse in prison probably won't change their behavior much.
In one of my links if you read them it says.....Some predatory sociopaths can be deterred. None can be rehabilitated, since they cannot return to a state that never existed.
I disagree with that statement. I completely reject the idea that a class of offender cannot be rehabilitated. If you talk about low success rates or great difficulty or the rarity of complete recovery, fine. But to categorically dismiss sex offenders as being incapable of change is just plain false.
The concept of coercive therapy is a contradiction; successful psychiatric treatment requires participants, not mere recipients. What makes sexual predators so intractable and dangerous is that, they like what they do and intend to keep doing it.
Again, you're painting with a very broad brush. There is a wide range of severity in sex crime. There is also a wide range of perversion among sex criminals. Some are absolute monsters, some are almost normal. Most are somewhere in between.
Your blanket assertion that "they like what they do and intend to keep doing it" certainly applies to some sex criminals. But there are many that it doesn't apply to. There are some who clearly recognize their danger to society and their lack of self-control, so they beg and plead to never be released from jail.
A 1992 study of 767 rapists and child molesters in Minnesota found those who completed psychiatric treatment were arrested more often for new sex crimes than those who had not been treated at all. A Canadian survey that tracked released child molesters for 20 years revealed a 43 percent recidivism rate regardless of the therapy. The difference between those simply incarcerated and those subjected to a full range of treatments appears statistically negligible.
Would you please post links to those studies? Forgive me for not just taking your word for it.
And a number of other studies--those that I posted were just a few of them--found different results. One of those that I posted was a "metastudy", where they combined the results of many other studies. That one found that most convicted sex offenders do not repeat their crimes.
Another factor that thwarts rehabilitation is the need for offenders to seek higher and higher levels of stimulation. There is no observable waning of their desires over time: sexual predators do not outgrow their behavior. Thus, while most sadistic sex offenders are not first arrested for homicide, they may well try to murder someone in the future. Those too are facts if you don't want to believe them fine.
I'm well aware of the nature of the sex offender and the need for increased stimulation. In fact, that need is a factor in nearly all crime, in one way or another. But those who go from sex crimes to homicide are small minority. And it's clearly wrong to treat all levels of sex offenders as though they're hunting for someone to mutilate. Should we also treat anyone arrested for a fistfight as though they're a potential serial killer? The fact is, most of them don't escalate into monsters.
And yes there is a witch hunt on for sex offenders. However when you read the heinous crimes that repeat offenders do it does make one's blood boil. Or sentences like the Judge In Mass gave to a sex offender, 6 months in jail. People are scared and they are afraid for their children. Look at NAMBLA that group is damn scary. They promote sex with children.
You're absolutely right that there are very dangerous, scary people out there. Those should be locked up for a long, long time or executed.
There are cases where judges give sentences that are too light.
There are groups that promote repulsive, vile and illegal activity.
That's all true. But it's not all of them. And there are plenty of other monsters who don't commit sex crimes and seem to get overshadowed by those who do, for some reason.
I would like to believe that sex offenders can go live normal lives but the fact is and many will tell you this is that the desire to reoffend is just too great. As the one link put it so well....Sexual predators are already narcissistic; they laugh behind their masks at our attempts to understand and rehabilitate them. We have earned their contempt by our belief that they can change—by our confusion of "crazy" with "dangerous," and "sick" with "sickening."
Still, you're grouping all sex offenders into one big pile. You splatter the blood and horror of the very worst of them over the entire group, giving them all up as dangerous lost causes. That's an understandable emotional response, but also completely unfair and dishonest.
It isn't going to happen.
It already does. You ignore, deny or dislike that fact all you want, but it's there anyway. Some of them do change and recover.
Instead I would rather see sex offenders who are higher risk kept behind bars where they can't offend again. If one child is saved by keeping them jailed its well worth it.
I agree with you. The challenge is figuring out which ones are higher risk. And even then, the courts can only sentence criminals within the bounds of the law.
Realistically, we can't lock up every sex offender forever; we simply don't have the jail space.
Being molested is something that never leaves a child. Have you given thought to the victims and to what these offenses do to them? Try thinking of how their little lives are ruined for life why don't you?
Ma'am, you have no idea what I've seen. I understand your anger, and I share it. I have children, and I have witnessed more than you might think.
But I've also seen what vigilantism can do. I've watched what mobs blinded by rage can do to completely innocent people. I see the beginnings of mob rage and vigilantism frequently surrounding the issue of sex offenders, and I'm only trying to get people to take the time to think and act carefully.
This is why we have jury trials and elected legislators. A frenzied mob will not act in a controlled way to dispense justice. Overzealous cops looking for bad guys to punish are already knocking down the wrong doors and sometimes shooting the wrong people.
Sex offenses absolutely ruin lives. It's a gasping-for-breath heartbreaking tragedy. But so is attending the funeral of your son because he was killed by people who mistook him for a monster.