Posted on 11/20/2006 11:19:51 AM PST by Sopater
(CNSNews.com) - A Christian social work student who took Missouri State University to court after a liberal professor targeted her for refusing to lobby for homosexual adoption said Thursday she and the teacher had clashed over her beliefs from day one.
Emily Brooker was vindicated when the university agreed to an out-of-court settlement, and the professor was disciplined.
In her suit, Brooker, who has since graduated, accused the university of violating her First Amendment right to free speech by exercising her Christian convictions.
Brooker brought the case after the professor, Dr. Frank G. Kauffman, filed a "level three" grievance against her - the most serious in the school's disciplinary system - after they clashed over an advocacy assignment.
She told Cybercast News Service that the class was required to write a letter to their senator advocating for homosexual adoption and foster care. Brooker said she opposes homosexual adoption because of her beliefs as a Methodist.
Brooker said she and another student objected.
"We were willing to do all of the research and the other parts of the assignment, even writing a letter - we just didn't want to sign it and send it to our senator. We did not feel that advocating for this is in our personal beliefs," she said.
The other student, who was not held in violation or involved in the lawsuit, has not been named.
Brooker described her first class with Kauffman.
"The very first class I had with him, he introduced himself as Dr. Kauffman and [said] that he was a liberal professor - but to feel free to share any other opinions you might have," she recalled.
"There were several times during that first class that we disagreed on a few political issues, and he made it known to me that my opinions were not acceptable in the class."
After Kauffman filed the grievance, Brooker faced a lengthy session of questioning by an ethics committee, during which she was asked questions like: "Do you think gays and lesbians are sinners?" and "Do you think I'm a sinner?"
She was accused of violating the school's Standards of Essential Functioning in Social Work Education - a black mark on her record that she knew would affect her future career as a social worker.
Brooker sought help from the Alliance Defense Fund. The group, which defends religious liberty, agreed to represent her. She filed the lawsuit on Oct. 30, but the university last week signed an out-of-court agreement with her legal representatives.
The university said in a statement it had agreed to clear Brooker's record, pay her $9,000, and cover the costs of a two-year Masters degree course, plus living expenses, at any state university in Missouri.
It said Kauffman had voluntarily stepped down from his administrative duties as director of the Master of Social Work program. He would also not be teaching for the remainder of the semester.
"The matter's behind us, it's been resolved in a collegial fashion, and we wish Emily nothing but the best," John Black, general counsel at Missouri State University, said Friday.
"Nobody here has anything but the best hopes for Emily ... and are confident she will do very well."
Black said that the university had "good grievance procedures."
"This was an event that when the university investigated it, we didn't confirm everything that was alleged, but we were concerned enough that we thought action needed to be taken and taken quickly."
'Silencing the opposition'
Erik Stanley, chief counsel for the religious freedom organization Liberty Counsel, told Cybercast News Service it was "appalling" that Brooker had been required to sign a document that violated her religious beliefs.
"I don't think anyone should be required to do that, regardless of social workers' ethics. Those types of issues like homosexuality or abortion - things that are very divisive and that people hold very strong religious views on - should not be mandated by the government in order to engage in these kinds of professions, like social work," Stanley said.
"The end result of the homosexual movement is not same-sex marriage," he added. "It is silencing the opposition. The end goal of the same-sex movement cannot tolerate anybody that has an opposing view point. These kinds of cases are indicative of that."
"I only wish other administrations would respond as quickly to violations of students' rights," ADF senior legal counsel David French said.
"Being a Christian shouldn't make you a second-class citizen on a college campus," said French in a statement.
"Instead of being a marketplace of ideas, some professors try to silence or even punish students whose beliefs do not conform to their personal worldview. To its credit, the university launched an investigation immediately after Emily's case was filed and has taken appropriate action against the professor and to repair Emily's reputation and record.
Brooker said people had asked her if she would do it again.
"I would definitely do this again. It was very important to me to let my voice be heard. I was very afraid for other students that didn't want to stand up, didn't want to say anything or question the authority that the professors have in the classroom," she said.
Brooker had no ill-feeling towards Kauffman.
"He is very knowledgeable in what he does. He knows the information, and he is a very good teacher in that aspect," she said.
"I was never setting out to get him fired - that was never my goal. I just wanted him, the department and the university to realize that the authority that professors perceive to have in the classroom has gone beyond what our policies allow them," Brooker added.
Kauffman did not respond to phone and email requests to comment for this article.
Reminds you of the Soviets doesn't it...
Good news.
MAke no mistake about it, Kauffman = Fascist.
"The check's in the mail. You can trust me, I'm not like the others. I have a bridge to sell you," he continued.
Obviously, not the kind of Methodist who runs the show in that denomination.
I'm glad I studied engineering, and then computer science, where the professors' personal opinions on a wide variety of subject were not something they generally shared with us or imposed on us. Many were probably conservative, some probably liberal, but it was not something that ever came up in class.
"because of her beliefs as a Methodist"
Good for her! As a member of the Methodist church myself, it is rare to see a member of our church actually take a public stand against homosexuality like this.
Yes, good thing for her she is able to ascribe to Wesley's doctrines and is not a member of the Eastern conferences.
Kool.
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping lists.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Good. Let's hope other lib profs take this as official notice that we are going to fight back.
I had no idea what to political beliefs of my main grad school professor were until I ran into him many years later at the Boortz/Hannity get out the Republican vote road show in late 2004.
Yes, and heterosexuals are sinners. I'm a sinner too. You're a sinner. Evangelical preachers are sinners. Buddhist Monks are sinners. Ronald Reagan was a sinner, and Bill Clinton is a sinner. That's what Christianity teaches. Everybody sins, and Jesus paid the price for your sins. If you believe in Jesus, then you're as pure as the wind-driven snow in the eyes of the Lord.
And this a-hole professor would be the first to call Bush a "Nazi." Libs like him just don't see the irony of their own hypocrisy.
Interesting he feels free to refer to her by her first name. Bet he doesn't call professors by their first name.
I wonder if they asked, "Are you now or have you ever been a Christian?"
Ahh dont you just love how liberals are soooooooooooo tolerant to diversity and other viewpoints!!!!!! NOT
Great Article exposing the liberals in their turf!!
..."we thought action needed to be taken and taken quickly."
They responded quickly so the liberals would not be exposed??...as they did here!!...hhmmm...they duck real fast when they are exposed!!..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.