To: staytrue
Excuse me. The draft furnished the bulk of the U.S military in WW I, WW II,Korea and Viet Nam. I wouldn't call any of them "military failures". I would call the last two "political failures", caused by no stones on, and no patience in, the body politic.
I have always believed in the draft. One thing sadly missing in this country is a sense of civic duty. the draft provided that. Only good conclusion [albeit for the wrong reason] Rangel's ever had.
57 posted on
11/19/2006 10:58:46 AM PST by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: PzLdr
I have always believed in the draft. One thing sadly missing in this country is a sense of civic duty. the draft provided that. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Not that we lack civic duty, but that a draft provides it. Coercing people to serve only instills resentment. If people had a sense of civic duty, no draft would be required except in the most exigent circumstances, as late in the Civil War. Rather than support conscription, I would support a system where service was voluntary, but a prerequisite to holding civic office and voting.
173 posted on
11/19/2006 12:04:48 PM PST by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: PzLdr
I believe today's equipment takes a little more training to use than did equipment in 1940 or 1952. We're not in need of millions of bodies of cannon fodder - we need smart dedicated people who are committed to the mission. That's a volunteer military, and it's the way this country was founded. We didn't draft men in the Revolutionary war.
319 posted on
11/19/2006 2:54:51 PM PST by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: PzLdr
War today for the US military emphasizes technology and taking few casualties than in the past and calls for a more highly trained and professional soldier than past wars.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson