To: PeteB570
"Yes, a draft could bring in numbers but also a whole lot more headaches."
In the broader picture , a draft [without loopholes, or with very few of them] can also bring in increased social cohesion. This ought to be considered as a valuable societal benefit regardless of all the rest.
41 posted on
11/19/2006 10:50:21 AM PST by
GSlob
To: GSlob
a draft [without loopholes, or with very few of them] can also bring in increased social cohesion.
Social cohesion is the goal of totalitarian states. Freedom is the goal of the United States.
To: GSlob
Well when it comes to Armies, you need Big Numbers and if there is an associated headache.....well, take some asprin.
67 posted on
11/19/2006 11:04:23 AM PST by
scannell
To: GSlob
Sorry, must disagree.
The military's job is to fight wars.
Look at the fun the media is having with the few military protesters we have now.
With a draft we will pull in 90% who will suffer through their two years, doing well and get out, 5% who will find they like it at reenlist and 5% who are dragged kicking and screaming into the military and who make a 1SGs life a never ending series of IG calls.
The dems want a draft for the media attention and protests it will bring, not for helping the military.
It costs to much to train up and then release a two year draftee. Most of the military is pretty high tec these days. A three or four year draft will never work.
Look at what the D-rats want to roll into the draft, the old "Service to America (with education)"
Thanks, but no thanks.
107 posted on
11/19/2006 11:24:06 AM PST by
PeteB570
(Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
To: GSlob
"Yes, a draft could bring in numbers but also a whole lot more headaches."
In the broader picture , a draft [without loopholes, or with very few of them] can also bring in increased social cohesion. This ought to be considered as a valuable societal benefit regardless of all the rest.
---
Even at the height of the Viet Nam War we needed only 1/3 of each year class in the military. So loopholes were rampant because they needed such a low percentage.
So with no loopholes where do YOU plan to put all the bodies, since you're against loopholes? How are we going to afford a military of that size?
This is a Democrat con job, don't fall for it.
266 posted on
11/19/2006 1:20:04 PM PST by
Cheburashka
(World's only Spatula City certified spatula repair and maintenance specialist!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson