If that's really the case, I would take this book with a kilogram of salt. I wouldn't believe him on the WTC 7 story. But I would approach this current book now with a certain degree of skepticism.
OTOH, from the brief contact I had with Lance, I get the feeling he may be onto something on this story. I wouldn't rule it out of hand just yet. In my experience as a journo, sometimes you come across stuff that frankly leaves you shaking your head. Part of the difficulty as a journo is deciding what belongs in the wacko file, and what belongs in print. I gave up trying to write fiction after a couple years of seeing reality on the streets. No one would believe you if you wrote some of what you see as fiction, but they believe it when you write it as nonfiction.
Like I said, Lance has gone into the wacko file for the WTC 7 demolition. About this -- there probably are some kernels of truth here, but IMO one has to dig for them.
Thanks for filling me in his Coast-to-Coast AM dig where Lance went off the deep end. I was not aware of it.
No, I don't dismiss the story. I think it has merit but if he's pushing that CIA blew up WTC7, I'd prefer not to give him my money for his book and wait for other journalists to pick up on it. Or I'll just read it at the bookstore :)