[outdriving]

"Protecting the sovereignty of one's borders is conservative."

It certainly is. Please tell us what the Neocons are doing to protect our borders? They want open borders.

"Removing dangerous dictators in this day and age of WMD is conservative."

You mean like Kim Jung Il?, or the Iranian nutjob? What about the Chinese and the Russians? They aren't/weren't dangerous? Where does it end?

"The terms "Paeleocon" and "Neocon" are WP-type BS."

You're right, the so called "Paleocons" are conservatives. The "Neocons" are facists.

"BTW, without the help of the "entangled" French army, George Washington and this conservative country may never have won the Revolution."

You forgot the Hessian mercenaries. But you are forgetting that the French helped us not out of "entanglements", but out of hatred of the British. If not for the entanglements of the UN resolutions, Bush would have had no excuse to invade Iraq.

France offering aid to our revolution is not the same as the U.S. invasion and occupation of a sovereign country with no congressional declaration of war.

You have a strange definition of conservative. To me, conservative is having respect for law. Removing "dangerous dictators" with WMD is arguably wise, but it is not "conservative".

It is a radically progressive, leftist idealism.

[FreeReign]

France offering aid to our revolution is not the same as the U.S. invasion and occupation of a sovereign country with no congressional declaration of war.

Congress declared war.This has been covered here on FR many times. Don't post such stale propaganda.

You have a strange definition of conservative. To me, conservative is having respect for law.

I've done nothing to disrespect the law. What a dopey comment.

Ping me only when you have something constructive to say. okay? Thanks.

BTW, only a global socialist such as yourself would think Saddam's Iraq was remarkably "sovereign".