Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RaceBannon

There are people who believe Macarthur was a great general. I personally think he was the epitome of the pompous ass general officer.

Sitting in Australia wringing his hands, talking about how things should be done and botching most of his operations. His strength was the American officers and soldiers who served under him...they were the only ones who did anything of substance.

Just my opinion (and certainly not a slam on those who served in the Army in the Pacific Theatre)


11 posted on 11/19/2006 8:10:49 AM PST by rlmorel (The US Media...Where you get Million Dollar Words From people with a Ten Cent Fart for a brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

Great military battles are won by leaders who have sufficient committment, strength of will, and self-confidence that they can get the troops to fight for them. Some degree of military prowess helps, too. Absence of jerk-dom and pomposity aren't included in the list of attributes.

Most of history's great military leaders were loud, rude, or pompous jerks, and many were masters of internal politics. Dugout Doug fit the mold.


29 posted on 11/19/2006 12:08:17 PM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson