To: Free ThinkerNY
As for giving up essential liberty, Rudy had to make many compromises in order to run NYC. If he had not, Dinkins would have been re-elected and the city would have been much worse off. I'm sure that Rudy would not have to make some of those same compromises on a national level.
And some of his most liberal policies are ones that he agrees with Dinkins and liberal Dims on, in opposition to all the Red states needed to win. And he has bragged about holding those positions repeatedly.
On abortion, gun rights, pro-family issues, Rudy is every bit as liberal as Hillary or more so. His nomination will be the death knell of the old Republican alliance with conservative voters on smaller government, strong defense, moral values. You intend to smash it all so you can have a liberal candidate that will end up losing to Hillary anyway, even in New York. But it won't matter much to you because you're content with Hillary anyway.
Good grief, he ducked an election with her in 2000. Then he refused to run this year. If he can take her out so easily, then why didn't he run against her for Senate this year?
He's a stalking horse for Hillary. He is the master of ceremonies for her coronation.
To: George W. Bush
251 posted on
11/19/2006 2:09:28 PM PST by
Free ThinkerNY
((((Truth shall set you free))))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson