Replies

It's nice that you think that conservatives can survive Clinton 2. The question is, can this country survive.

Better go hide under your bed. The truth is that we are almost as endangered now as we were prior to 9/11. Very little has been done unless strip-searching old ladies at the airports floats your boat. There are still vast numbers of people who pour in over the northern and southern borders. There are hundreds of thousands of people here on visas or as students from radical Islamic countries. There is very little that anyone has done about the danger posed by, well, say a phosgene gas attack in your subways or in the ventilation of your large buildings. I mention only one type of easy attack for the sake of brevity. There are many other types of attacks we have not suffered yet that do not require airliners or large numbers of terrorists.

Only by expelling the radical Islamic elements and controlling our borders will we gain any measure of genuine security. But first we have to stop calling it the Religion Of Peace, a title especially insulting to devout Christians.

Why you place so much confidence in one gun-grabbing pro-abortion pro-sodomy liberal from New York over another one is beyond me. He's never even been elected to a statewide office and he has no experience in foreign policy. He was not in the military nor does he have any military command experience.

It's like a mirror image of Hitlery. Yet the liberal with the GOP banner is all that will save your life and the liberal with the Dim banner will kill you.

If this is typical of New York political thinking, no wonder it's had the problems it's had over the decades. The rest of the country is unlikely to buy into it.

Many Americans won't survive WMD attacks.

Then they may eventually learn not to vote for Dhimmicrats. The election of creatures like the Xlintons and the Pelosis is by those who inhabit these socialist paradises. They need to learn the consequences of their choices. They love to talk about choice. I say let them learn if they haven't yet. It's not my fault they're so stupid and I don't owe them my vote for a liberal like Rudy to save them from a liberal like Hillary. Basicly, it becomes a dispute over your favorite liberal. Not my game but I can see why you like it.

All other issues are secondary to our national security.

"Those who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security deserve neither liberty nor security." - attributed to Benjamin Franklin (but probably written by fellow diplomat Richard Jackson in a book Franklin published)

He's never even been elected to a statewide office and he has no experience in foreign policy. He was not in the military nor does he have any military command experience.

If you think Rudy is a mirror image of Hitlery there's no point in wasting my time responding after this. By the way, President Bush had no foreign policy experience. I suppose he should resign the Presidency immediately. Franklin Roosevelt was never in the military and had no command experience. I guess he wasn't qualified to be President and lead us in WW2.
As for giving up essential liberty, Rudy had to make many compromises in order to run NYC. If he had not, Dinkins would have been re-elected and the city would have been much worse off. I'm sure that Rudy would not have to make some of those same compromises on a national level.