Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush works to keep pressure on N. Korea
AP ^

Posted on 11/17/2006 7:13:02 PM PST by Lunatic Fringe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: Lunatic Fringe

Pull em out and redeploy them to Iraq. To hell with helping countries that dont want to help themselves. We have bigger fish to fry.


61 posted on 11/18/2006 6:16:50 AM PST by DeusExMachina05
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Our economy is heavily dependent on South Korea for things like computer memory chips. They need us, and we need them.

It is not strategically wise to be dependent on any foreign country in an unstable region of the world for any vital commodity although sometimes you have no choice.

We cannot realistically change the fact that the Persian Gulf happens to contain 70% of the World's known oil reserves but we can certainly do something about the fact that we are not producing our own computer chips.

62 posted on 11/18/2006 6:22:46 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Why are they not concerned? Why are our troops there? How can the president keep our troops and policy at a location where the host nation doesn't recognize the danger? At this point, who cares?

Because they have the protective umbrella of the American Armed Services. To keep the Godless NOKO horde from over-running a vital free-market economy in the East. It is easier to do nothing than something. I, as sure as $hit, don't care.


63 posted on 11/18/2006 6:32:01 AM PST by Harrius Magnus (Not Welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Brimack34

Big time. Pull out.


64 posted on 11/18/2006 6:32:09 AM PST by elfman2 (An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I served a tour in Korea many, many, yrs. ago. It was an appreciative country at the time. But, like the USA it is being taken over by the far left radicals and, I agree with many of the post here, it's time to pull our troops out.

Other than helping protect Japan and a few other insignificant islands, they no longer need us. There economy is full speed ahead, they can now afford to protect themselves.

I would also include Japan into this categorie, they are a rich nation and have the means of protecting themselves.

To think the money as a nation we would save by freeing ourselves from these syphoning countries.


65 posted on 11/18/2006 6:39:47 AM PST by buck61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

"any reason as to why ?"

- The only reason that I can fathom is that South Korea is playing a waiting game, trying to appear neutral, in the hopes that when the North Korean regime collapses (sooner rather than later, they hope) they will have maintained a closer relationship with the North and thereby be in a position to negotiate reunification.
Or, as Winston Churchill once said, their policy may be simply to feed the tiger in the hopes that it will eat them last.


66 posted on 11/18/2006 6:47:53 AM PST by finnigan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

.........To hell with South Korea. Let them fight their own battles...............

And let them keep their steel, and their ship-building, and their autos, and electronics. Cut off trade with the ungrateful bastards!


67 posted on 11/18/2006 6:51:39 AM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

Let S. Korea fend for themselves!


68 posted on 11/18/2006 6:58:24 AM PST by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I doubt very much that anyone in SK thinks their trade is at risk. Because nobody in the US is even talking about real consequences to their choosing North Korean nutjobs over the people who bled to keep them free. So they think - like everyone else in the world these days - that sticking a finger in the eye of the US is costless and politically clever. But there will be consequences, there always are.
69 posted on 11/18/2006 7:32:29 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
When is the next general election (legislative and presidential) in Korea?

Any sense of what the popular sentiment is since the NK test?

70 posted on 11/18/2006 7:33:40 AM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

Well, South Koreans are just a few miles from a madman dictator. They are concerned about keeping peace with Kim, to avoid war. And they probably figure, rightly, that they cannot count on the United States or any other nation to come to their defense. The South Vietnamese could not count on the U.S., ultimately, and now the Iraqis can't either. The more voters elect cut and run Democrats, the weaker the U.S. gets in the eyes of other nations.


71 posted on 11/18/2006 7:34:35 AM PST by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

ping


72 posted on 11/18/2006 7:35:22 AM PST by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

SK is terrified of NK, wussies.


73 posted on 11/18/2006 7:47:07 AM PST by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buck61
Japan reimburses the great majority of te cost to position US military assets there.

Additionally, Japan is a STRATEGIC ally and STRATEGIC target of all who are hostile to the US. We are there because of Russia and China...mostly China.

Korea is a different story. The ONLY reason we are there is because of a dusty old treaty.

We should inform the SKoreans that we'll begin a phased withdraw of ALL assets there starting the first day after their next general election. While we'll continue to honor our treaty obligations, we'll do so only with strategic assets we have in theatre. We should also let them know we are not opposed to renegotiating the existing treaty.

Shake 'em up, see what happens.

74 posted on 11/18/2006 7:48:15 AM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

"dependent on South Korea for things like computer memory chips."

start buying chips down in mexico. keeps illegals home.


75 posted on 11/18/2006 7:50:44 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: buck61

"To think the money as a nation we would save by freeing ourselves from these syphoning countries."

Exactly. Wase of money, waste of a lot of political rhetoric about "valued partner", and just start treating them like any other trade nation. Once we start redeploying out of there, Kim will launch an attack to get their resources. And then SK will be standing in the storm with their hat out.


76 posted on 11/18/2006 7:53:44 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown; hedgetrimmer
Next, build a wall around the entire U.S.

Land grabber!

77 posted on 11/18/2006 8:01:17 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
I think you got the answer- Let Japan handle this- that is something N. Korea does NOT want to happen- Japan won't mess around with them- they'll give an ulamatem & either N.K will comply or face the consequences.

Christian news and commentary at: sacredscoop.com ...

78 posted on 11/18/2006 8:54:49 AM PST by CottShop (http://sacredscoop.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; toddlintown
Land grabber!

Americans aren't supposed to own property anymore? What, in your globalist mind is wrong with building a fence around ones property? There's a fence around the white house. And there's a fence around Bush's ranch in Texas. You say citizens wanting to protect their property by the way of a national border is landgrabbing? We have a constitutional right to protect our property and it is being evaporated by the globalists and their falsely named "free trade" system. The true agenda of the "free traders" is becoming quite apparent. Thanks for calling it to everyone's attention.
79 posted on 11/18/2006 9:37:28 AM PST by hedgetrimmer (I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

When you receive something for nothing, you never appreciate it!


80 posted on 11/18/2006 9:58:40 AM PST by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson