To: PeterFinn
I don't know why, (but) the staff decided to analyze them," I'm wondering if that's because somebody had a second thought...
2 posted on
11/17/2006 2:51:54 PM PST by
paudio
(War on Terror is more important than War on Gay Marriage...)
To: paudio
I would never eat anything sent to me, especially if I was a political official.
34 posted on
11/17/2006 3:58:10 PM PST by
LukeL
(Never let the enemy pick the battle site. (Gen. George S. Patton))
To: paudio
I'm wondering if that's because somebody had a second thought...I think it may have been the note with the cookies which said "I am" or "We are" followed by "going to kill you. This is poisoned."
And Justice O'Connor, a judge which hands down the final word on our laws wonders why the staff decided to analyze them. Lordy. Hopefully, she was speaking tongue-in-cheek, eh?
To: paudio
What's O'Connor trying to do now at this late date, elicit some kind of ridiculous sympathy or something, or confirm to the world how stupid she really is? Come on, really, what's the point? I think O'Connor is "half-baked" on this one, lol.
67 posted on
11/17/2006 7:19:45 PM PST by
khnyny
(God Bless the Republic for which it stands)
To: paudio
I don't know why, (but) the staff decided to analyze them,"
I'm wondering if that's because somebody had a second thought...
The Hartford Courant has an article about this in Saturday's paper. It includes an interesting tidbit:
The typewritten notes contained threatening statements about killing the recipients, but also warned that the treats were poisoned ...
So, as usual, Sandy O is just lying. She was never in danger.
76 posted on
11/17/2006 11:44:34 PM PST by
SWake
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson