Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeterFinn
This story did come out last year. Sandy baby just in whine mode. Compared to the fate that awaits the judges in Iraq in the Saddam Hussein trials I find her whining ludicrous.

She wants everyone to stop criticizing judges because it get's people angry at them.

12 posted on 11/17/2006 2:57:08 PM PST by OldFriend (WEAKNESS IS A PROVOCATION, AN INVITATION TO OUR FOES TO CONFRONT US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OldFriend

Sandra, just go home. Live out the rest of your days APOLITICALLY, please.


13 posted on 11/17/2006 3:00:49 PM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: OldFriend

Did you hear she was on the 'Iraq Advisory Panel'?


16 posted on 11/17/2006 3:05:35 PM PST by johnny7 ("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: OldFriend

"This story did come out last year. Sandy baby just in whine mode. Compared to the fate that awaits the judges in Iraq in the Saddam Hussein trials I find her whining ludicrous.

She wants everyone to stop criticizing judges because it get's people angry at them."

You are wise. That is exactly what this is about, as she shows with her misrepresentation of the facts;

"Every member of the Supreme Court received a wonderful package of home-baked cookies, and I don't know why, (but) the staff decided to analyze them," the Fort Worth Star-Telegram quoted O'Connor as saying..."

The note saying that the cookie crumbs/candy were poisoned might have been a tip-off.

A better question might be what is wrong with our system of justice that this woman was out on the loose after having tried to kill off her relatives a few years ago by sending them all bottles of poisoned wine.


45 posted on 11/17/2006 4:46:20 PM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: OldFriend
She wants everyone to stop criticizing judges because it get's people angry at them.

It's not a joke, there are some real nutcases out there. HOWEVER comma, it does seem to be a common rhetorical device often used - so-and-so received "death threats". Guilt by association from a debate standpoint. They don't have to be real or legitimate even. It goes hand in hand with the trend these days for folks to get exercised and offended over just about golly knows what these days. A sort of "professional" class of offended. Now what's interesting when people start talking about protecting speech that is disagreeable. It's not going to get any better, since students these days are further taught there is no objective reality/truth, so one opinion is as good as another! Not very healthy. Expensive, too.
55 posted on 11/17/2006 5:46:50 PM PST by Freedom4US (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson