Skip to comments.
O'Connor details half-baked attempt to kill Supreme Court
CNN.com ^
| POSTED: 2028 GMT (0428 HKT), November 17, 2006
| Kevin Bohn - CNN
Posted on 11/17/2006 2:50:00 PM PST by PeterFinn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: steveegg
So with only a simple note stating that the cookies were poisoned the staff decided to have them tested? I'm impressed.
41
posted on
11/17/2006 4:23:36 PM PST
by
FourPeas
(The right thing to do never requires any subterfuge, it is always simple and direct. Calvin Coolidge)
To: Charles Henrickson
Beware the bites of March! Ha! You are one sharp cookie!
42
posted on
11/17/2006 4:24:36 PM PST
by
my_pointy_head_is_sharp
(The internet: "What do you punch little buttons and things?"--Larry King)
To: paudio
the pre-election environment, if it worked, it means W got to appoint 9 SCOTUS... Not a good thing for the liberals... Continuing evidence that liberalism is a mental illness. Do they ever think about the consequences of their actions? No need to answer.
43
posted on
11/17/2006 4:27:25 PM PST
by
Diplomat
To: PeterFinn
Sandra Day's Career can be summed up with thes words:
"When I was a law grad, I considered my first job beneath me - sooooo - so I had it out for all men or whoever it was that pissed me off - and his kind the rest of my life! So there! And if Abortion came up - I voted for it because all things are men's fault! SO THERE!!"
44
posted on
11/17/2006 4:35:26 PM PST
by
SkyPilot
To: OldFriend
"This story did come out last year. Sandy baby just in whine mode. Compared to the fate that awaits the judges in Iraq in the Saddam Hussein trials I find her whining ludicrous.
She wants everyone to stop criticizing judges because it get's people angry at them."
You are wise. That is exactly what this is about, as she shows with her misrepresentation of the facts;
"Every member of the Supreme Court received a wonderful package of home-baked cookies, and I don't know why, (but) the staff decided to analyze them," the Fort Worth Star-Telegram quoted O'Connor as saying..."
The note saying that the cookie crumbs/candy were poisoned might have been a tip-off.
A better question might be what is wrong with our system of justice that this woman was out on the loose after having tried to kill off her relatives a few years ago by sending them all bottles of poisoned wine.
45
posted on
11/17/2006 4:46:20 PM PST
by
Sam Hill
To: PeterFinn
I don't know why, (but) the staff decided to analyze them," Celebrities and people in TV and radio have known this for years. Don't eat the "nice things" people drop by for you.
To: Anti-Bubba182
"Well at least we know the court has enough sense to not eat home baked food received in the mail from a stranger."
The letters never got to them.
And from what I've read from the DOJ's press releases there were not cookies so much as cookie crumbs.
I also don't believe there was enough rat poison in these crumbs/candy remnants to do kill a person.
But Sandra seems to prefer drama to facts.
47
posted on
11/17/2006 4:49:30 PM PST
by
Sam Hill
To: PeterFinn
What a freaking loon! Well, I wonder if Martha Stewart's cell is still available. I think it was equipped with a full kitchen, including mixing bowls and an oven.
48
posted on
11/17/2006 4:52:22 PM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Democracy: The worst form of government, except for all the others.)
To: PeterFinn
49
posted on
11/17/2006 4:52:33 PM PST
by
Sam Ketcham
(Amnesty means vote dilution, increased taxes to bring them UP to the Poverty Level!)
To: AnAmericanMother; 8mmMauser
she's the worst mistake Reagan ever made. She's half baked.
50
posted on
11/17/2006 4:54:37 PM PST
by
floriduh voter
(www.conservative-spirit.org or Join Terri's Legacy List Contact: 8mmmauser)
To: STARWISE
The attempt to kill Terri Schiavo wasn't half baked. She was actually killed. Thanks, Sandra for the memories.
51
posted on
11/17/2006 4:55:35 PM PST
by
floriduh voter
(www.conservative-spirit.org or Join Terri's Legacy List Contact: 8mmmauser)
To: PeterFinn
yah.. 'till after the elections.
52
posted on
11/17/2006 5:28:32 PM PST
by
Cinnamon
To: PeterFinn
Since there is not a word regarding the suspect's motivation or political affiliation, it is safe to assume she is a left-wing nitwit. We would have long since known if she were a Republican.
-ccm
53
posted on
11/17/2006 5:29:53 PM PST
by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order.)
To: Psycho_Bunny
I swear to God that if I could go back in time and kick any one person's ass, it would be the editor who first came up with this idea. I can sympathize, although I'd be after Karl Marx first.
-ccm
54
posted on
11/17/2006 5:31:10 PM PST
by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order.)
To: OldFriend
She wants everyone to stop criticizing judges because it get's people angry at them.
It's not a joke, there are some real nutcases out there. HOWEVER comma, it does seem to be a common rhetorical device often used - so-and-so received "death threats". Guilt by association from a debate standpoint. They don't have to be real or legitimate even. It goes hand in hand with the trend these days for folks to get exercised and offended over just about golly knows what these days. A sort of "professional" class of offended. Now what's interesting when people start talking about protecting speech that is disagreeable. It's not going to get any better, since students these days are further taught there is no objective reality/truth, so one opinion is as good as another! Not very healthy. Expensive, too.
To: PeterFinn
I think when you get old, the conspiracy theories begin to overtake you. It's not as if famous people and high level government people don't regularly get death threats. Only a fool would eat from a box of cookies that just came in over the transom. I guess she thinks we are all fools and believe her.
She should just go away
56
posted on
11/17/2006 5:49:02 PM PST
by
Tarpon
To: PeterFinn
57
posted on
11/17/2006 5:56:28 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: paudio
I'm wondering if that's because somebody had a second thought...I think it may have been the note with the cookies which said "I am" or "We are" followed by "going to kill you. This is poisoned."
And Justice O'Connor, a judge which hands down the final word on our laws wonders why the staff decided to analyze them. Lordy. Hopefully, she was speaking tongue-in-cheek, eh?
To: b4its2late; Sir Gawain
Barbara Joan March,
AKA Barbara McMahon,
AKA Bonnie McMahon.
59
posted on
11/17/2006 5:59:20 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: floriduh voter
Kennedy and Sandra.......oy, maybe they can do a beach blanket movie.
But you are not permitted to criticize Reagan.
60
posted on
11/17/2006 6:07:32 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(WEAKNESS IS A PROVOCATION, AN INVITATION TO OUR FOES TO CONFRONT US)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson