To: ichabod1
Bush, by this time in 1998, had more money in is pocket to run with than any other candidate in history. The conservatives didn't "make" Bush, my FRiend. He is the creation of the RINO Country Club Rockefeller types, the CFR, NE Olde Money, the Bildebergers, the Trilateral Commission, etc, etc, etc... No argument from me on that. The Bush's have a long Rockefeller GOP legacy. But when a man running as a Republican can stand before the nation and say that he and the most Liberal man in the DEM Party are not that far apart on most issues, there is very little left to support IMO.
228 posted on
11/17/2006 1:59:30 PM PST by
cva66snipe
(If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
To: cva66snipe
when a man running as a Republican can stand before the nation and say that he and the most Liberal man in the DEM Party are not that far apart on most issues, there is very little left to support IMO.Yeah, W was kind of foisted on us, and he's did some things that gave us hope, but in the end he is what he is -- his fathers son.
337 posted on
11/17/2006 9:07:12 PM PST by
ichabod1
(Democracy = Anarchy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson