They are alluding to a new means of attacking "in America". Reading the article, they use the phrase "in a new wonderful method". That could refer to the weapon of choice or it could refer to the target of choice.... or it could refer to both.
Also, The Vatican is not "in America".
No kidding about the Vatican. Tongue-in-cheek, you know?
I really wouldn't pay much attention to yet another statement by the "great and powerful OZ". He is all bluster.
Al Qaeda has been weakened by half, according to many conservative estimates.
It will take a lot more to scare me than this.
That's what got me, "which is the coming attack 'in' America," note he did not say 'on' America. This makes me want to believe that the attack will be made internally by operatives already hear.
Whether it is a WMD attack on a large population centers, on national landmarks such as D.C., an irreplacable national resource, or, God forbid, on multiple schools across the country; whatever the attack, the purpose will be to create a reaction by the US that will, in the perpetrator's eyes, lead us into an intolerable situation. This would be either no response, as we would not know where to hit, or striking out blindly and killing innocents as well as guilty.
They want to force us into playing their game. Which we must not do. We must play our game.
With such a calculating enemy there is only ever one response. Total annihilation. It may take decades. This is what they are counting on; that the West, and the US in particular, has lost the stomach for such an enterprise.
I somehow feel that they underestimate the intestinal fortitude of the American people.
I think it most likely that such a horrendous act would shift a very large percentage of the population to the point of view that something must be done, done now, and to a degree of finality that would forever erradicate any threat of resurgence.
If that sounds like the "final solution" and anyone takes offense then I apologise; but it is exactly how I feel.