To: dennisw
I'd say the police officer was the provocateur the moment he put his hand on the person who appeared to have been leaving the premises on his own accord. The cop has no right to touch an innocent civilian.
54 posted on
11/17/2006 1:50:40 AM PST by
Binstence
(Live freep or die)
To: Binstence
I'd say the police officer was the provocateur the moment he put his hand on the person who appeared to have been leaving the premises on his own accord. The cop has no right to touch an innocent civilian.
In the good old days he would have gotten a nightstick in the belly for yelling out (like some spoiled rich kid) "Get your hands off me"
He is not innocent. He is an agitator. A provocateur.
59 posted on
11/17/2006 1:55:36 AM PST by
dennisw
("For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks-- Matt. 12:34)
To: Binstence
"I'd say the police officer was the provocateur the moment he put his hand on the person who appeared to have been leaving the premises on his own accord."
The kid refused to leave.
89 posted on
11/17/2006 3:51:09 AM PST by
Dudoight
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson