Posted on 11/16/2006 4:46:47 PM PST by outofstyle
It also true that anytime you make a cash deposit at a bank that is greater than or equal to $10,000 the teller has to report it the feds (IRS). ""
Also same rules for withdrawal above $10K.
Yes, but did his laptop contain "mysterious files"? Inquiring minds want to know.
No. That's definitely sprinkled Methodist.
Based on some of the responses you can see how terrorists are able to exploit and abuse our civilization to murder us. Some people render themselves unable to identify friend from foe and are not only useless they are actually dangerous. Witness the Democrats and those who voted for them. Given their way we would go back to the Clinton methods for fighting IslamoFacism, namely keep being victims.
The ability of customs to search people at the border has never been considered an unreasonable search.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Few exceptions to the presumptive warrant and probable cause requirements are more firmly rooted than the border search exception. Pursuant to the right of the United States to protect itself by stopping and examining persons and property crossing into the country, routine border searches are reasonable simply by virtue of the fact that they occur at the border.
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/RL31826.pdf
So, you mean that it should be perfectly legal for people to carry tens of thousands of dollars in cash without having to declare it, nevermind the narcotic-sniffing dog (the one that tagged his luggage)? Organized crime loves voters like you. Flying is not a right. It is a federally regulated private enterprise offering transportation to the public. When people cross the borders of our nation, I should hope that they are subject to scrutiny by the government as this is part of their Constitutional responsibility.
That is only because the majority of us are patriotic American citizens and not leftist traitors, illegal or otherwise.
I must have missed the section of the article indicating the victim was a "leftist traitor". Sorry.
Yeah, I know the Left has a habit of calling people like Jose Padilla victims ...
Oh, I understand now, you where attempting to call me a "leftist traitor" because I would like to see our goverment restrained by the traditional limitations which where defined by our founding fathers in the Constitution of the United States of America.
Here I was thinking that "Free Republic" was a place to find like minded people. I must have been mistaken and this forum must have been named incorrectly. If "most" people here are as you describe, we should rename the site to "Constrained Democracy" or something along those lines.
Leftist traitor has a nice ring to it ...
A great man long ago seems to have described you pretty well.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
They key words being "essential liberty" and our essential liberty does not include rights for terrorists (or their supporters), other than the right to a fair trial and fast hanging (of our choice).
Why are you surprised. We're the "Land of the Free", after all.
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.
Thomas Jefferson, to Archibald Stuart, 1791
We can thank G-d General George Washington was Commander In Chief and not Thomas Jefferson.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.