Skip to comments.
NJ: Child Born to Lesbian Couple Will Have 2 Mothers Listed
NY Times ^
| 11/16/06
| LAURA MANSNERUS
Posted on 11/16/2006 4:15:11 PM PST by kiriath_jearim
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: kiriath_jearim
This couple was treated exactly the same way as a married couple under the law of New Jersey, said Stephen Hyland, the lawyer for the women. So no matter what New Jersey chooses to do legislatively, the couples have the same rights. And of course, it's all about the "rights" of perverted adults. The rights of this child to enjoy a natural parentage do not exist. She was created purely to satisfy their vanity and advance their political agenda. Pukes.
41
posted on
11/16/2006 5:08:57 PM PST
by
workerbee
(Democrats are a waste of tax money and good oxygen.)
To: Gay State Conservative
I know a pair. real butch both of them... One works at my job.
they adopted from the 3rd world.
they took an unwanted child away from poverty and depravity, but at what cost.
as an individual act of charity they may have saved the child's life...and if the child can get over the stigma...she may have a good life.
But with the combined effort of untold thousands of these abominations....it is helping the left in the destruction of civilized society.
42
posted on
11/16/2006 5:09:13 PM PST
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: kiriath_jearim
I do not think that it is biologically possible for the child to have two "mothers". Since the child has a "father" (the sperm donor), the "mothers" are committing fraud by not listing the father.
43
posted on
11/16/2006 5:15:30 PM PST
by
reg45
To: beagle9
The natural law will order us dead. Simple.
44
posted on
11/16/2006 5:16:53 PM PST
by
Soothesayer
(Birth is murder!)
To: xcamel
No! That's the father's name.
Does that make the child a baster bastard???
45
posted on
11/16/2006 5:17:26 PM PST
by
reg45
To: kiriath_jearim
The
court gave the Legislature 180 days either to bring gay couples within the states marriage laws or establish a parallel system of civil unions.
Nah! There is no such thing as legislation from the bench! /SARC
46
posted on
11/16/2006 5:18:54 PM PST
by
Don Corleone
(Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
To: kiriath_jearim
Either that child has a natural father or the mother's name is Mary and Jesus has returned. I strongly doubt the second possibility.
47
posted on
11/16/2006 5:21:08 PM PST
by
reg45
To: Vaquero
they took an unwanted child away from poverty and depravity. . . and brought her into financial comfort and depravity.
O.K. - I guess there's worse trade-offs.
I know a gay couple who own and work in a beauty salon. They adopted twin girls from an abusive, dysfunctional home who have multiple learning and behavioral disorders. I think they are doing O.K. The girls always have the BEST hair-do's!!! (I kid you not, those guys do them up every morning before school. They look like a million bucks.)
48
posted on
11/16/2006 5:24:01 PM PST
by
PLK
To: PLK
49
posted on
11/16/2006 5:33:58 PM PST
by
Greystoke
(The future doesn’t belong to the faint-hearted; it belongs to the brave - Ronald Reagan)
To: kiriath_jearim
Hypothetical situation:
- A woman get's pregnant by one man.
- She then marries another man.
- The child is then born.
Question: Who's name appears on the birth certificate? The husband's or the biological father's?
To: spikeytx86
I have enough trouble with one nagging mother but to the second power? God Bless this child. I feel sorrier for the kid's future spouse. Imagine two mothers-in-law!
51
posted on
11/16/2006 5:45:53 PM PST
by
P.O.E.
To: Vaquero
I'd rather live in a poor home with loving, Christian parents, than be stuck with two wealthy, gay women fighting against nature to prop up some ill-conceived notion of family.
To: kiriath_jearim
One baby = one egg + one sperm. That makes them liars on the birth certificate.
53
posted on
11/16/2006 5:50:41 PM PST
by
tioga
To: Greystoke
54
posted on
11/16/2006 5:51:42 PM PST
by
PLK
To: kiriath_jearim
So this child has no right to a father.
There should be laws to stop this. A child is entitled to a mother and a father.
Not a "parent and sex fetish partner."
55
posted on
11/16/2006 5:54:22 PM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: kiriath_jearim
there is an easy way to fix this.
No man can be a sperm donor without a child support obligation.
No man is allowed to make annonymous donations which the child can never find out.
56
posted on
11/16/2006 6:02:47 PM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: spinestein
Presumably, if one of my girlfriends gives birth in New Jersey, I can have my name and all twelve of my other girlfriends' names listed as legal parents on the birth certificate Either that or your girlfriend would have to list all twelve of her boyfriends.
To: kiriath_jearim
A lesbian couple in South Jersey won court approval this week to have both of their names listed as parents on the birth certificate of their newborn, Now we have to pretend not to know how children are conceived.....
This is warped.
58
posted on
11/16/2006 6:08:07 PM PST
by
Jorge
To: kiriath_jearim
59
posted on
11/16/2006 6:12:16 PM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF 68-73...."never store a threat you should have eliminated")
To: opinionator
60
posted on
11/16/2006 6:43:08 PM PST
by
spinestein
(DOING THE JOB THE OLD MEDIA USED TO DO)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson