To: pctech
So who will it be? Rudy?Romney?Pawlenty?Newt?Huckabee?Frist?Brownback?Pataki? They have no chance.
At the end of the day, McCain seems still the most viable candidate. Not right on everything but a lot to work with. Stay with this fratricidal attitude and we will get Hillary or Edwards in 08
To: Red in Philly
Geesh.........is that you John?
41 posted on
11/16/2006 4:33:29 PM PST by
Osage Orange
(The old/liberal/socialist media is the most ruthless and destructive enemy of this country.)
To: Red in Philly
So who will it be? Rudy?Romney?Pawlenty?Newt?Huckabee?Frist?Brownback?Pataki? They have no chance. At the end of the day, McCain seems still the most viable candidate. Not right on everything but a lot to work with. Stay with this fratricidal attitude and we will get Hillary or Edwards in 08
You forgot that disclaimer:
"This shameless plug for McCain on FR was authorized by John McCain for President, and as a relative newbie, I'm happy to support that scumbag. - Red Philly - registered Oct 23, 2006."
48 posted on
11/16/2006 4:45:26 PM PST by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: Red in Philly
At the end of the day, McCain seems still the most viable candidate. Not right on everything but a lot to work with. Stay with this fratricidal attitude and we will get Hillary or Edwards in 08 Patience. At this point in the 2000 cycle (i.e., 1998), where was George W. Bush on the GOP presidential candidate list?
Answer: he had just been re-elected governor of Texas and some people were starting to suggest he might deserve consideration. In other words, he was about where Pawlenty is now.
55 posted on
11/16/2006 4:58:10 PM PST by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: Red in Philly
Yes, at least McCain hasn't got the liberal baggage of a Rudy Guiliani.
Of course neither has Hillary Clinton...
58 posted on
11/16/2006 5:01:49 PM PST by
mrsmith
To: Red in Philly
Sorry bub, I'll vote for someone who is purely evil, like Billary, before I'll vote for someone who is insane like McLame.
Evil tends to be rational, looking out for it's own best interests at the least, you won't get any form of reason out of the Lunatic.
Support that madman if you will, I will NEVER vote for him. Under ANY circumstances.
61 posted on
11/16/2006 5:08:57 PM PST by
Dr.Zoidberg
(Mohammedism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
To: Red in Philly
70 posted on
11/16/2006 5:34:44 PM PST by
STARWISE
(They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
To: Red in Philly
Stay with this fratricidal attitude and we will get Hillary or Edwards in 08.
In order for it to be "fratricide" McCain would have to be a Conservative.
77 posted on
11/16/2006 6:00:30 PM PST by
msnimje
(You simply cannot be Christian and Pro-Abortion.)
To: Red in Philly
The line will have to be drawn somewhere, the more we capitulate on our presidential candidates the more liberal they'll become.
I guess it's a case od "damned if we do, damned if we don't" scenario.
79 posted on
11/16/2006 6:20:49 PM PST by
pctech
To: Red in Philly
Keep supporting RATpublicans, stay in the minority. It don't get no simpler than that. Blackbird.
97 posted on
11/17/2006 5:38:53 AM PST by
BlackbirdSST
(Stay out of the Bushes, unless you're RINO hunting!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson