To: kiriath_jearim
Even the radical Bush-bots cannot sweep this pro-illegal Mexican move under the rug. He clearly is not hiding his PERSONAL agenda any more.
2 posted on
11/16/2006 3:14:25 PM PST by
EagleUSA
(T)
To: kiriath_jearim
As a Texan, I'm obviously quite pleased with the Court's decision. But I'm really concerned about American judges who lean heavily on foreign court rulings.
To: kiriath_jearim
State sovereignty in the state of Texas. Nice.
4 posted on
11/16/2006 3:15:43 PM PST by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: kiriath_jearim
The president has made an admirable attempt to resolve a complicated issue involving the United States international obligations, Presiding Judge Sharon Keller wrote in a concurrence. But this unprecedented, unnecessary and intrusive exercise of power over the Texas court system cannot be supported by foreign policy authority conferred on him by the United States Constitution.
Admirable???????????
I don't think so! The last sentence says it all. He's a globalist who bears contempt for our sovereignty......the writing to support that is on the ceiling, walls, and floors.
To: kiriath_jearim
To: kiriath_jearim
What the,....?
Is this the same guy that I voted for twice??
Way to go Texas - standing up for state and national sovereignty!
17 posted on
11/16/2006 4:07:14 PM PST by
incredulous joe
(Alan Keyes is my homeboy!)
To: kiriath_jearim
Seems like we need to ask why things happen that do not make sense and quit believing that the unbelievable is really not believable.
26 posted on
11/16/2006 4:26:51 PM PST by
dforest
(Don't get fooled, the bigger struggle is still out there, and growing)
To: kiriath_jearim; SouthTexas; NYTexan; WestCoastGal
LONG LIVE TEXAS and the FReepers that live there until I can con them out of their property and livelihood so I can move there and not have to eat Armadillo...
27 posted on
11/16/2006 4:27:28 PM PST by
tubebender
(Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
To: kiriath_jearim
In 2004, the International Court of Justice in The Hague ruledAs soon as the Hague sends soldiers to Texas for enforcing their farcical rulings, I will care. Meanwhile, swift justice is denied for the victims. We must move forward and carry out the sentences.
41 posted on
11/16/2006 5:05:37 PM PST by
ARealMothersSonForever
(We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
To: kiriath_jearim
What Country is Bush the President of?
Mexico?
Iraq?
Israel?
Venezuela?
To: kiriath_jearim
68 posted on
11/16/2006 6:14:39 PM PST by
VOA
To: kiriath_jearim; Mr. Mojo
When the question of whether the international tribunals ruling must be followed reached the United States Supreme Court last year, President Bush issued a memorandum to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales directing state courts to abide by the decision of the tribunal.But.......but.......I thought President Bush said we wouldn't belong to any international courts? < / sarcasm > Shredding our Constitution with all of his global dreams is criminal, IMO, but the little Bush bots will still lick his boots. Unbelievable!
74 posted on
11/16/2006 6:53:44 PM PST by
NRA2BFree
(THOSE WHO LIVE BY THE SWORD GET SHOT BY THOSE WHO DON*T!)
To: kiriath_jearim
President Bush was an ass. That was a stupid directive. Our courts should follow AMERICAN law, not the decision of some foreign tribunal. We're a sovereign country and when it comes to our own affairs the Hague should butt the hell out of it.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
78 posted on
11/16/2006 7:50:15 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: kiriath_jearim
Even the radical Bush-bots cannot sweep this pro-illegal Mexican move under the rug. He clearly is not hiding his PERSONAL agenda any more. He's just becoming ever more bolder increasingly in anti-American intentions it would seem.
80 posted on
11/16/2006 9:20:51 PM PST by
Ron H.
(So went the Whigs back then, so are going the Republicans of today - - - - -)
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..
To: kiriath_jearim
Incredible. The President sends a memo to the AG directing the state courts to obey a foreign court's decision and the USSC sends it back to the state? Unbelievable.
94 posted on
11/17/2006 12:35:26 PM PST by
edsheppa
To: kiriath_jearim
We hold that the president has exceeded his constitutional authority by intruding into the independent powers of the judiciary, Judge Michael Keasler wrote for the court, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. YES!
:-)
103 posted on
11/19/2006 2:24:15 PM PST by
MamaTexan
( I am not a ~legal entity~....... nor am I a 'person' as created by law.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson