Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Qaida plotting nuclear attack on UK, officials warn
The Guardian ^ | November 14, 2006 | Vikram Dodd

Posted on 11/16/2006 10:53:11 AM PST by OESY

British intelligence officials believe that al-Qaida is determined to attack the UK with a nuclear weapon, it emerged yesterday. The announcement, from an officially organised Foreign Office counter-terrorism briefing for the media, was the latest in a series of bleak assessments by senior officials and ministers about the terrorist threat facing Britain.

UK officials have detected "an awful lot of chatter" on jihadi websites expressing the desire to acquire chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear weapons....

The warning comes after a speech last week by the foreign secretary, Margaret Beckett, on the terrorist threat facing the UK, and a rare public outing for Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, the head of MI5, who warned that there were at least 30 active plots to attack Britain.

With new counter-terrorism measures to be unveiled in tomorrow's Queen's speech, the weekend saw Gordon Brown back an extension to the time for which terrorism suspects can be held without charge, beyond the current 28 days....

For al-Qaida and jihadis, a devastating nuclear attack on Britain, not just the use of a "dirty bomb', would be part of the desire and agenda to cripple the west, sources said....

The network of the rogue Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan, which is feared to have sold nuclear technology to Libya, Iran and North Korea, was broken up three years ago, but there are fears that other illegal networks may exist.

British counter terrorism officials believe plots they have thwarted and plots they claim are being hatched have strong links to Pakistan. They say hundreds of Britons travelled in the past year to Pakistan for terrorism activity, including training in camps and acting as couriers for messages. Officials also believe Britons are taking cash to terrorists in Pakistan.

(Excerpt) Read more at politics.guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaida; britain; buttheyareourfriends; forecast4500degrees; nuclear; nukeplot; nukeplots; uk; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-258 next last
To: word_warrior_bob

islamicfinder dot org will be a good palce to start.


81 posted on 11/16/2006 11:49:28 AM PST by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways Guero » with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rjp2005

20 years from now, that may change. For now, it's not happening nor will they even consider it.


82 posted on 11/16/2006 11:50:58 AM PST by rjp2005 (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ichabod1

True. Forgot those points......


83 posted on 11/16/2006 11:51:31 AM PST by b4its2late (Liberalism is a hollow log and a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer
I don't get it. Isn't Britain 25% Islam right now? Why attack there?

Because Muslims kill Muslims. Why are the muslim terrorists in Iraq killing Iraqi Muslims?

Because they are a bloddthirsty death cult, that's why.

84 posted on 11/16/2006 11:54:08 AM PST by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rjp2005

We have not been aggressive enough since 9/11, I'm almost hoping they detonate a nuclear bomb (hopefully, accidentally in their own region) so that we can respond with the overwhelmingly appropriate response this war needs.

Look at the contrast (in our response) between Pearl Harbor and 9/11.


85 posted on 11/16/2006 11:54:46 AM PST by word_warrior_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: OESY

It is only a paradox for peace-niks, that the thing which they most want to avoid by appeasement is that which they inevitably encourage.

Their fundamental pig ignorance is that they think that the bully on the block will be avoided by showing signs of "reasonableness"...read weakness.

So, they will bring the chaos to us all. Yet in their colossal stupidity, they don't realize that they are going to be the last ones prepared for when the fruits of their "philosophy" strikes home. So be it. The chips have fallen, and I will have to look after my idiot friends and family, because I won't have the luxury of caring about the others.

But maybe they're right and I'm wrong. At this point, I hope they're right, but I doubt it.


86 posted on 11/16/2006 11:57:40 AM PST by guitfiddlist (When the 'Rats break out switchblades, it's no time to invoke Robert's Rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

It's OK, most leftists are infinitely more worried about generating electricity with nuclear power than about jihadists acquiring WMDs and using them in cities, so I'm sure this is nothing to worry about..... /s


87 posted on 11/16/2006 12:00:04 PM PST by Enchante (America-haters and Terrorists Around the World Embrace Chamberlain Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan
Don't be ridiculous, they are less than 3%. Are you simply trying to live up to your handle?

Relax. I was being slightly tongue-in-cheek.

88 posted on 11/16/2006 12:01:43 PM PST by The Blitherer (In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Al-Qaida plotting nuclear attack on UK, officials warn


WHEW, FOR A MOMENT I THOUGHT THEY WERE INTERESTED IN ATTACKING THE USA /SARC
89 posted on 11/16/2006 12:01:45 PM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjp2005

bttt


90 posted on 11/16/2006 12:01:47 PM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob
What do we do when the first terrorist nuclear/dirty bomb goes off anywhere?

After we change our skivvies, we impose a complete embargo against the Arab world until they decide to join the rest of us in the 21st century.

91 posted on 11/16/2006 12:04:18 PM PST by Lunatic Fringe (Say "NO" to the Trans-Texas Corridor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob

Kiss the Bill of Rights goodbye.


92 posted on 11/16/2006 12:09:25 PM PST by Finalapproach29er (Dems will impeach Bush if given a chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: justanotherdayinparadise

Just so it's proportionate...


93 posted on 11/16/2006 12:10:34 PM PST by bruin66 (Time: Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: OESY

gee, you think the US media would focus on London being nuked - maybe a 2 day story - unless some new Foley IMs are discovered.


94 posted on 11/16/2006 12:10:45 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

very true, that would be the best plan.

but my fear is - nothing would be done.


95 posted on 11/16/2006 12:11:36 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer

"Isn't Britain 25% Islam right now? Why attack there?"

Because they are moderate matyrs.


96 posted on 11/16/2006 12:12:44 PM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Isn't it sad that many of us think nothing, or something "measured" will be done?

Have we become that weak as a nation or are we just projecting our disappointment about the last election?


97 posted on 11/16/2006 12:14:02 PM PST by word_warrior_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: OESY

To see what the government WOULD do if we were nuked, watch the speech at the end of the Sum of all Fears.

For what we should do, any Muslim's worst nightware would do.


98 posted on 11/16/2006 12:14:23 PM PST by TeenagedConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: guitfiddlist

"Can we live in a more insane world?"

You tell me after reading this:

http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?category=REGION&storyID=526597&BCCode=&newsdate=10/18/2006


99 posted on 11/16/2006 12:16:47 PM PST by panaxanax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: OESY

I think that Bush should keep the football close. And if our allies get nuked send a pair to Saudi Arabia.

Apologize later. Time to smake this BS down.


100 posted on 11/16/2006 12:18:32 PM PST by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson