It's not an "opinion," it's the actual age of the remains, as determined by radiocarbon dating. In fact, the Vindija specimens have been subject to rigorous date testing by a number of independent teams.
Saying that radiocarbon dating is an "opinion" is as asinine as telling the police officer who pulled you over that the "80 mph" on his radar gun is an "opinion." Actually, more asinine, because radar guns are less accurate than radiocarbon dating and are not operated in controlled, laboratory conditions.
The cop was there.
>>Saying that radiocarbon dating is an "opinion" is as asinine as telling the police officer who pulled you over that the "80 mph" on his radar gun is an "opinion." Actually, more asinine, because radar guns are less accurate than radiocarbon dating and are not operated in controlled, laboratory conditions.<<
I disagree:
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c007.html
http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/06dat5.htm
Also, even those who believe it is accurate only trust it back, say, 50,000 years. And that is assuming none of the issues discussed in my second link above don't hold water. Since nobody was there (unlike the cop with a radar gun), it is all deduction and opinion.