This tactic of the DBM only succeeds because the Pubs surrender. My plan is to call ALL of them out. Know your enemy and their weaknesses, know the DBM and it's weaknesses. When your "baggage" is put on display, make sure theirs is sitting next to it. When they mention you divorcing your wife, you mention their drowning of their girlfriend. When they tie you to a lobbyist, you tie them to communist China. If you have the b@lls to fight back they will cease fire. Acquiescing to their attacks only makes them bolder.
When your "baggage" is put on display, make sure theirs is sitting next to it. When they mention you divorcing your wife, you mention their drowning of their girlfriend. When they tie you to a lobbyist, you tie them to communist China. If you have the b@lls to fight back they will cease fire. Acquiescing to their attacks only makes them bolder.
BRAVO!
The "baggage" then becomes the focus and baggage vs. baggage, as we found out, results in our loss.
The MSM provides more amplification to their side, afterall.
So rather than give the opposition a built-in weapon (i.e., Newts baggage) why not see if a less-complex candidate (i.e., less or no baggage) emerges, but use Newt-the-street-fighter as the coach?
JMO