Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DCBandita
Puh-leeze. Reinforcing the issue as "Choice" is the correct way to characterize it, because it advocates nothing but that: a choice.

So, you are advocating that people have the right to "choose" whether or not to terminate the life of a person whose life would be an inconvenience to them. Nevermind that in most cases, they could have exercised their "choice" in the first place and not become pregnant.

And yes, "pro-choice" people advocate for abortion, and support tax-payer funded abortion (regardless of the inividual taxpayer's stance on the issue.) "Choice" is not the correct way to characterize the termination of a human life.

Choice is a euphamism Abortion is a generous enough term. Murder is closer to the truth.

544 posted on 11/14/2006 10:26:58 PM PST by Washi (Support the country you live in, or go live in the country you support.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies ]


To: Washi; Petronski; murphE; Vicomte13; DCBandita

Check out the posting history of DCBandita. I think the line "I smell ozone" is appropriate.


546 posted on 11/14/2006 10:36:20 PM PST by Pyro7480 ("Give me an army saying the Rosary and I will conquer the world." - Pope Blessed Pius IX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson