Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins
I agree that the US does not see this as a religious conquest.

And Cromwell did.

I don't mean to discount your comparison; religion is the subtext in everything that happens in the Middle East. I just don't think the West has the religious critical mass (pardon the pun) to mount a crusade again. And I don't think Islam has the cohesion. So it's a matter of apathy versus chaos.

At least at the religious level ...

Whatever the West is fighting for, it isn't Christianity.

85 posted on 11/14/2006 6:30:39 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack

However, there are many parallels.

One I find intriguing is the eventual requirement to separate the warring forces, as much as possible, into 2 separate nations.

Cromwell did bring a religious element in with his, but we could say that the US is bringing a political element in that is at odds with the religious history of Iraq. The democratization of Iraq is a contrary doctrine to Islam. This democratization is a matter of faith.....that all the world would be better were it democratic.


87 posted on 11/15/2006 5:19:46 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson