Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Muzzle_em

No flames here.

What is happening in Britain is not the same as DNR. The medical authorities are attempting to justify the parcelling of care to people and deciding who is worthy of survival.
Babies who are born who are deformed can be "ordered" to die. That is what they are angling to do: create the argument framework to justify killing infants. They already allow abortions...so why this move?
Right now it is the infants who are at risk of being killed.
"Granny" is just the next step.

I understand families who don't want to let go, having just gone thru that with an elderly relative.

But that is not what this is: this is "medical practioners" deciding for the family: doesn't matter what the family wants, needs or desires. Now the Church is saying its ok....more cover for the "ethical" argument.

That, I submit, is just plain wrong.


31 posted on 11/14/2006 6:53:08 AM PST by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Adder

agreed


32 posted on 11/14/2006 7:30:32 AM PST by Muzzle_em (taglines are for sissies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson