Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lee'sGhost
The "narrow group of politicians" you refer to was almost the entire population of the South. And speaking of "chaos" the War for Southern Independence was THE most chaotic episode in our history. What would have resulted if Lincoln had not gone to war would have been the opposite of chaos

It's wasn't me but your Confederate Vance who said that the rebellion was of the politicians and not the people.

There was large groups of southerners who had no desire for separation. This sentiment was particularly strong in places like Northern Alabama, East Tennessee and Western NC, but it existed everywhere. When people like Sherman showed the rest of the population the price that would have to be paid for a slaveowners' state, many of them quit the fight also.

Chaos was inevitable when you split one people into two. We were one people with only an interest in slavery and the desire for power by a few slaveowners separating us.

35 posted on 11/14/2006 7:07:49 AM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Colonel Kangaroo

"It's wasn't me but your Confederate Vance who said that the rebellion was of the politicians and not the people."

You can cherry pick quotes to justify or rationalize ANY position on the war. "It was about slavery." "It was about state's rights." "It was about neither." Take your pick. they're all out there some where.

"There was large groups of southerners who had no desire for separation."

There were large groups of northerners who said "let them go." So?

"When people like Sherman showed the rest of the population the price that would have to be paid for a slaveowners' state, many of them quit the fight also."

Oh, I thought Linclon fought the war to bring the south back into the union. OK, which one of you is lying?

"Chaos was inevitable when you split one people into two."

Oh, really? Go tell that to the Brits and their former subjects in Candada. We all remember the great Canadaian Revolution, don't we.

"We were one people with only an interest in slavery and the desire for power by a few slaveowners separating us."

Yup, tarrifs, unfair legislation, state's rights had nothing to do with it.

Hey, I got nothing on you, dude.


37 posted on 11/14/2006 7:19:43 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson