Posted on 11/13/2006 7:33:48 PM PST by blam
BBC frightened of criticising Islam, says archbishop
By Jonathan Petre, Religion Correspondent
Last Updated: 2:21am GMT 14/11/2006
The Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, has accused the BBC of bias against Christianity and says the broadcaster fears a terrorist backlash if it is critical of Islam.
The archbishop, the second most senior figure in the Church of England's hierarchy, said Christians took "more knocks" than other faiths at the hands of the BBC.
Dr Sentamu claims Christians take ‘more knocks' at the BBC
"They can do to us what they dare not do to the Muslims," he said. "We are fair game because they can get away with it. We don't go down there and say, 'We are going to bomb your place.' That is not in our nature."
The Ugandan-born archbishop nevertheless said Christians must be more forceful in promoting their beliefs.
Blaming the "chattering classes" for undermining trad-itional Christian culture, he said: "They see themselves as holding the flag for Britain and that Britain is definitely secular and atheist. I want them to have their say but not to lord it over the rest of us."
In an interview with the Daily Mail, he called for a return to family values and an end to the tyranny of materialism, especially at Christmas.
"We have become a society where we all gather around the microwave or the television. Even while you are eating, the television is blaring. Come on!
"Parents should spend more time talking to children because that is where behaviour is learned, in the home."
Dr Sentamu rejected the idea of the Church severing its remaining ties with the state. "People of other faiths say to me that the Church establishment is critical because it is a bulwark against a secularising agenda," he said.
"The Church of England reminds the nation that in this country the Queen is Defender of the Faith, head of the Commonwealth and head of state." The Queen, he added, was the "real uniting force" and no politician "could ever rise to her level".
Dr Sentamu also questioned whether Muslim women were required to wear the veil by the Koran, and argued that those who did should not expect British society to be reordered to accommodate them.
He said Muslim scholars would say three things about the veil. "First, does it conform to norms of decency? Secondly, does it render you more secure? And thirdly, what kind of Islam are you projecting by wearing it?
"I think in the British context it renders you less secure because you stick out and it brings unwelcome attention.
"On the first question (of whether the veil conforms to norms of decency) I don't think it does conform."
The archbishop said he never wore a cross when visiting a synagogue or mosque, explaining: "Because I am going into someone else's home. And I can't simply say, 'Take me as I am, whether you like it or not.'
"I think the thing is in British society you can wear what you want, but you can't expect British society to be reconfigured around you. No minority can expect to impose this on the public or civic life."
A BBC spokesman declined to comment but referred to a newspaper article by Mark Thompson, the director general, which denied that the BBC was systematically biased against Christianity and in favour of Islam, saying that it did not square with the facts.
The Muslim Council of Britain said that if women chose to wear the veil on religious grounds it was "their business and no one else's" as long as it did not conflict with the rights of others.
I'm sure they are.
Having a car bomb driven thru your front doors with a guy behind the wheel screaming "Allahu Akhbar!" is usually a detterant to most people.
That's how terrorism works. It depends on the support of cowards who flog pacifists but remain silent in the face of evil.
I'm not sure about this: "The archbishop said he never wore a cross when visiting a synagogue or mosque, explaining: "Because I am going into someone else's home. And I can't simply say, 'Take me as I am, whether you like it or not.'"
But otherwise, good for the archbishop for having the courage to state things as they are--something that's all to rare these days.
Amen to that... im very sure this man knows too well what Muslims will do to Europe if they'll have the majority. It sad to know that somebody from far away is taking his stand for Christianity and for Britain's future while the natives of the country seems to be afraid to offend the muzzies.
Millions of Europeans have believed just that for many,many years.
Hey BBC---- Thats why they are called TERRORISTS.
Everything will be just fine as long as they keep their heads in the sand....less likely for them to get CHOPPED OFF that way.
He is the gold.
So is Albany, NY
No Shi'ite!
A very wise man, this Archbishop. Thanks for the post.
Oh yeah? Look at the BBC "religion" page online. It relegates Christianit to an obscure sect, but has all kinds of graphics related to Hinduism and Buddism.
"Oh yeah? Look at the BBC "religion" page online. It relegates Christianit to an obscure sect, but has all kinds of graphics related to Hinduism and Buddism."
This one?: http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/
At the moment I see a lead story on Christianity, a sub story on todays episode of Songs of Praise and no Hindu or Buddhist graphics at all. Then there are sub-sections featuring various different religions.
They do try to mix it up though, so maybe you just looked when they happened to have a lead story on Hinduism?
If I were a woman, I would get some stiletto heels and really bust a move on them toes!
It is upon people like this man that the fate of the Church of England relies.
I believe we will be seeing more of him.
Wow. Quite different from the way it was for months - even years. Their standard icon was a row of Hindu gods. Maybe they're finally responding to the complaints.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.