Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
But leading pro-abortion Democrats tell Bush he needs to pick someone without a record opposed to abortion in order to get judges

But... isn't this a so-called dreaded "litmus test" that we've heard so much about?

194 posted on 11/14/2006 6:46:29 AM PST by kevkrom (John F'n Kerry's 'apology': "I'm sorry you were too stupid to realize I wasn't calling you stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kevkrom
But... isn't this a so-called dreaded "litmus test" that we've heard so much about?

Evidently it isn't a litmus test when the 'Rats propose it, it's called "consensus nominees". The first step in despotism is taking over the language, and the 'Rats are doing it. Abortion isn't abortion, it's "choice". Likewise, imposing a pro-abortion bias is not so much requiring a litmus test as appealing for "bipartisanship". Only 'Pubs impose a "litmus test" in a 'Rat-dominated world gone mad, and that of course is unacceptable.

195 posted on 11/14/2006 6:55:33 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson