[Psycho_Bunny]

Ever notice the difference between the DU and FR entries at Wiki?

The FR entry is basically just one big slam on FR...the Criticism section is comparatively huge.....the longest I've seen at Wiki.  

But there's no lock and no dispute.  It's like, no one at FR cares.

The DU entry is constantly locked over disputes.  The Criticism section is cut down to nothing and tagged with a "Weasel Words" entry.  The links are "questionable" because they lead to sites critical of DU.

I always find it amusing.

 

[LuxMaker]

Ever notice the difference between the DU and FR entries at Wiki?
The FR entry is basically just one big slam on FR...the Criticism section is comparatively huge.....the longest I've seen at Wiki.

But there's no lock and no dispute. It's like, no one at FR cares.

The DU entry is constantly locked over disputes. The Criticism section is cut down to nothing and tagged with a "Weasel Words" entry. The links are "questionable" because they lead to sites critical of DU.

I always find it amusing.

When you have an army of people on the public dole, you can afford to run operations like these.

[my_pointy_head_is_sharp]

The FR entry is basically just one big slam on FR...the Criticism section is comparatively huge.....the longest I've seen at Wiki. But there's no lock and no dispute.

Yes, you're right. Just went over there to check it out. I had somehow missed most of the controversies. Why isn't somebody correcting the inaccuracies and misperceptions? The whole entry sounds like it was written by a DU-er. And such a HUGE section on a relatively unknown poster (totally unknown to me), Marc Costanzo. That could only be written by an agenda-driven DU-er. Somebody needs to go to the site often, and check for inaccurate statements.