Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zippy the razor

Was Hastings actually prosecuted and convicted?

If he is in fact a convicted felon, under the law he would be ineligible for the security clearances necessary to run that committee.

Of course that has never stopped the dems before.


5 posted on 11/13/2006 8:41:49 AM PST by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rottndog

Since when do Demoncrats play by the rules?

Ever seen Clinton's medical history?

Ever seen dufus, Kerry's military record?


11 posted on 11/13/2006 8:49:12 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: rottndog
I'm fuzzy on this, but I think Members of Congress are exempt from security clearance requirements, just like the President is. It comes with the office. However, both Houses have come up with their own requirements for Members accessing, receiving, and using Classified information.

It actually makes sense, theoretically. Members of Congress are the people's representatives. They should have access to all information about government, and should be able to share it with the public. If they want to restrict themselves (via their leadership) that's their business. If Congressmen can't be trusted, who's fault is that?
12 posted on 11/13/2006 8:49:16 AM PST by NYFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: rottndog

The bad thing about security clearances is that if your job (as an elected official) requires one, you will get it no matter what. Bill Clinton (and his cabinet) was a perfect example of this.


17 posted on 11/13/2006 9:07:46 AM PST by free_at_jsl.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: rottndog
It's obvious this Hastings is not gay.....sarc/
18 posted on 11/13/2006 9:10:32 AM PST by Jeffrey_D.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: rottndog

It's obvious; Hastings is not gay.....sarc/


21 posted on 11/13/2006 9:11:47 AM PST by Jeffrey_D.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: rottndog
He was acquitted by a federal jury, though there was strong suspicion of tampering. He was Impeached by the House, Convicted by the Senate.
31 posted on 11/13/2006 10:22:25 AM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson