To: zippy the razor
Was Hastings actually prosecuted and convicted?
If he is in fact a convicted felon, under the law he would be ineligible for the security clearances necessary to run that committee.
Of course that has never stopped the dems before.
5 posted on
11/13/2006 8:41:49 AM PST by
rottndog
(WOOF!!!)
To: rottndog
Since when do Demoncrats play by the rules?
Ever seen Clinton's medical history?
Ever seen dufus, Kerry's military record?
11 posted on
11/13/2006 8:49:12 AM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: rottndog
I'm fuzzy on this, but I think Members of Congress are exempt from security clearance requirements, just like the President is. It comes with the office. However, both Houses have come up with their own requirements for Members accessing, receiving, and using Classified information.
It actually makes sense, theoretically. Members of Congress are the people's representatives. They should have access to all information about government, and should be able to share it with the public. If they want to restrict themselves (via their leadership) that's their business. If Congressmen can't be trusted, who's fault is that?
12 posted on
11/13/2006 8:49:16 AM PST by
NYFriend
To: rottndog
The bad thing about security clearances is that if your job (as an elected official) requires one, you will get it no matter what. Bill Clinton (and his cabinet) was a perfect example of this.
To: rottndog
It's obvious this Hastings is not gay.....sarc/
To: rottndog
It's obvious; Hastings is not gay.....sarc/
To: rottndog
He was acquitted by a federal jury, though there was strong suspicion of tampering. He was Impeached by the House, Convicted by the Senate.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson