Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LC HOGHEAD

I listened to Rush and I agree with your post. However, with such a narrow defeat for Talent, as well as such narrow races around the country, even if 1 in 20 listeners beleive that Rush was objectionable, that would be enough to swing races. The discussion of Fox, as accurate as it was, may better have been left undisturbed by our esteemed host simply because even a tiny fraction of controversy could swing the election. When things are that close, you don't want any intensification of controversy. Or if the controversy came from someone who is very good at spearheading controversy. Anne Coulter would have been a much better conservative point-person against Fox. She is very good at breaking the ice on cotroversioal, sensitive subjects so other people can more openly talk about them.


79 posted on 11/13/2006 7:41:37 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: doc30

St. Louis once again decided the election. Talent didn't have enough valid votes to overcome the fraud.


134 posted on 11/13/2006 8:03:07 AM PST by OldFriend (Run and Hide, Tax and Spend for the next two years. Everyone happy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson